us； so much of every product as is rendered by excessive abundance inconsumable； becomes useless； valueless； unexchangeable；consequently； unfit to be given in payment for any thing whatever； and is no longer a product。
Consumption； on the other hand； to be legitimate；to be true consumption；must be reproductive of utility； for； if it is unproductive； the products which it destroys are cancelled valuesthings produced at a pure loss； a state of things which causes products to depreciate in value。 Man has the power to destroy； but he consumes only that which he reproduces。 Under a right system of economy； there is then an equation between production and consumption。
These points established； let us suppose a community of one thousand families； enclosed in a territory of a given circumference； and deprived of foreign intercourse。 Let this community represent the human race； which； scattered over the face of the earth； is really isolated。 In fact； the difference between a community and the human race being only a numerical one； the economical results will be absolutely the same in each case。
Suppose； then； that these thousand families； devoting themselves exclusively to wheat…culture； are obliged to pay to one hundred individuals； chosen from the mass； an annual revenue of ten per cent。 on their product。 It is clear that； in such a case； the right of increase is equivalent to a tax levied in advance upon social production。 Of what use is this tax？
It cannot be levied to supply the community with provisions； for between that and farm…rent there is nothing in common； nor to pay for services and products；for the proprietors； laboring like the others； have labored only for themselves。 Finally； this tax is of no use to its recipients who； having harvested wheat enough for their own consumption； and not being able in a society without commerce and manufactures to procure any thing else in exchange for it； thereby lose the advantage of their income。
In such a society； one…tenth of the product being inconsumable； one…tenth of the labor goes unpaidproduction costs more than it is worth。
Now； change three hundred of our wheat…producers into artisans of all kinds： one hundred gardeners and wine…growers； sixty shoemakers and tailors； fifty carpenters and blacksmiths； eighty of various professions； and； that nothing may be lacking； seven school…masters； one mayor； one judge； and one priest； each industry furnishes the whole community with its special product。 Now； the total production being one thousand； each laborer's consumption is one； namely； wheat； meat； and grain； 0。7； wine and vegetables； 0。1； shoes and clothing； 0。06； iron…work and furniture； 0。05； sundries； 0。08； instruction； 0。007； administration； 0。002； mass； 0。001； Total 1。
But the community owes a revenue of ten per cent。； and it matters little whether the farmers alone pay it； or all the laborers are responsible for it；the result is the same。 The farmer raises the price of his products in proportion to his share of the debt； the other laborers follow his example。 Then； after some fluctuations； equilibrium is established； and all pay nearly the same amount of the revenue。 It would be a grave error to assume that in a nation none but farmers pay farm…rentthe whole nation pays it。
I say； then； that by this tax of ten per cent。 each laborer's consumption is reduced as follows： wheat； 0。63； wine and vegetables； 0。09； clothing and shoes； 0。054； furniture and iron… work； 0。045； other products； 0。072； schooling； 0。0063； administration； 0。0018； mass； 0。0009。 Total 0。9。
The laborer has produced 1； he consumes only 0。9。 He loses； then； one…tenth of the price of his labor； his production still costs more than it is worth。 On the other hand； the tenth received by the proprietors is no less a waste； for； being laborers themselves； they； like the others； possess in the nine… tenths of their product the wherewithal to live： they want for nothing。 Why should they wish their proportion of bread； wine； meat； clothes； shelter； &c。； to be doubled； if they can neither consume nor exchange them？ Then farm…rent； with them as with the rest of the laborers； is a waste； and perishes in their hands。 Extend the hypothesis； increase the number and variety of the products； you still have the same result。
Hitherto； we have considered the proprietor as taking part in the production； not only （as Say says） by the use of his instrument； but in an effective manner and by the labor of his hands。 Now； it is easy to see that； under such circumstances； property will never exist。 What happens？
The proprietoran essentially libidinous animal； without virtue or shameis not satisfied with an orderly and disciplined life。 He loves property； because it enables him to do at leisure what he pleases and when he pleases。 Having obtained the means of life； he gives himself up to trivialities and indolence； he enjoys； he fritters away his time； he goes in quest of curiosities and novel sensations。 Propertyto enjoy itselfhas to abandon ordinary life； and busy itself in luxurious occupations and unclean enjoyments。
Instead of giving up a farm…rent； which is perishing in their hands； and thus lightening the labor of the community； our hundred proprietors prefer to rest。 In consequence of this withdrawal；the absolute production being diminished by one hundred； while the consumption remains the same；production and consumption seem to balance。 But； in the first place； since the proprietors no longer labor； their consumption is； according to economical principles； unproductive； consequently； the previous condition of the communitywhen the labor of one hundred was rewarded by no productsis superseded by one in which the products of one hundred are consumed without labor。 The deficit is always the same； whichever the column of the account in which it is expressed。 Either the maxims of political economy are false； or else property； which contradicts them； is impossible。
The economistsregarding all unproductive consumption as an evil； as a robbery of the human racenever fail to exhort proprietors to moderation； labor； and economy； they preach to them the necessity of making themselves useful； of remunerating production for that which they receive from it； they launch the most terrible curses against luxury and laziness。 Very beautiful morality； surely； it is a pity that it lacks common sense。 The proprietor who labors； or； as the economists say； WHO MAKES HIMSELF USEFUL； is paid for this labor and utility； is he； therefore； any the less idle as concerns the property which he does not use； and from which he receives an income？ His condition； whatever he may do； is an unproductive and FELONIOUS one； he cannot cease to waste and destroy without ceasing to be a proprietor。
But this is only the least of the evils which property engenders。
Society has to maintain some idle people； whether or no。 It will always have the blind； the maimed； the insane； and the idiotic。 It can easily support a few sluggards。 At this point； the impossibilities thicken and become complicated。
THIRD PROPOSITION。
Property is impossible； because； with a given capital； Production is proportional to labor； not to property。
To pay a farm…rent of one hundred at the rate of ten per cent。 of the product； the product must be one thousand； that the product may be one thousand； a force of one thousand laborers is needed。 It follows； that in granting a furlough； as we have just done； to our one hundred laborer…proprietors； all of whom had an equal right to lead the life of men of income；we have placed ourselves in a position where we are unable to pay their revenues。 In fact； the productive power； which at first was one thousand； being now but nine hundred； the production is also reduced to nine hundred； one…tenth of which is ninety。 Either； then； ten proprietors out of the one hundred cannot be paid； provided the remaining ninety are to get the whole amount of their farm…rent；or else all must consent to a decrease of ten per cent。 For it is not for the laborer； who has been wanting in no particular； who has produced as in the past； to suffer by the withdrawal of the proprietor。 The latter must take the consequences of his own idleness。 But； then； the proprietor becomes poorer for the very reason that he wishes to enjoy； by exercising his right； he loses it； so that property seems to decrease and vanish in proportion as we try to lay hold of it； the more we pursue it； the more it eludes our grasp。 What sort of a right is that which is governed by numerical relations； and which an arithmetical calculation can destroy？
The laborer…proprietor received； first； as laborer； 0。9 in wages； second； as proprietor； 1 in farm…rent。 He said to himself； 〃My farm…rent is sufficient； I have enough and to spare without my labor。〃 And thus it is that the income upon which he calculated gets diminished by one…tenth；he at the same time not even suspecting the cause of this diminution。 By taking part in the production； he was himself the creator of this tenth which has vanished； and while he thought to labor only for himself； he unwittingly suffered a loss in exchanging his products； by which he was made to pay to himself one…tenth of his own farm…rent。 Like every one else； he produced 1； and received but 0。9
If； instead of nine hundred laborers； there had been but five hundred； the whole amount of farm…rent would have been reduced to fifty； if there had been but one hundred； it would have fallen to ten。 We may posit； then； the following axiom as a law of proprietary economy： INCREASE MUST DIMINISH AS THE NUMBER OF IDLERS AUGMENTS。
_ _This first result will lead us to another more surprising still。 Its effect is to deliver us at one blow from all the evils of property； without abolishing it； without wronging proprietors； and by a highly conservative process。
We have just proved that； if the farm…rent in a community of one thousand laborers is one hundred； that of nine hundred would be ninety； that of eight hundred； eighty； that of one hundred； ten； &c。 So that； in a community where there was but one laborer； the farm…rent would be but 0。1； no matter how great the extent and value of the land appropriated。