《what is property》

下载本书

添加书签

what is property- 第4部分


按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页,按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页,按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部!
 many ideas of his own; but is not the very foundation of ancient Jewish law to be found in its condemnation of usurious interest and its denial of the right of personal appropriation of land?

The first memoir on property appeared in 1840; under the title; 〃What is Property? or an Inquiry into the Principle of Right and of Government。〃  Proudhon dedicated it; in a letter which served as the preface; to the Academy of Besancon。  The latter; finding itself brought to trial by its pensioner; took the affair to heart; and evoked it; says Sainte Beuve; with all possible haste。

The pension narrowly escaped being immediately withdrawn from the bold defender of the principle of equality of conditions。  M。 Vivien; then Minister of Justice; who was earnestly solicited to prosecute the author; wished first to obtain the opinion of the economist; Blanqui; a member of the Academy of Moral and Political Sciences。  Proudhon having presented to this academy a copy of his book; M。 Blanqui was appointed to review it。  This review; though it opposed Proudhon's views; shielded him。  Treated as a savant by M。 Blanqui; the author was not prosecuted。  He was always grateful to MM。 Blanqui and Vivien for their handsome conduct in the matter。

M。 Blanqui's review; which was partially reproduced by 〃Le Moniteur;〃 on the 7th of September; 1840; naturally led Proudhon to address to him; in the form of a letter; his second memoir on property; which appeared in April; 1841。  Proudhon had endeavored; in his first memoir; to demonstrate that the pursuit of equality of conditions is the true principle of right and of government。  In the 〃Letter to M。 Blanqui;〃 he passes in review the numerous and varied methods by which this principle gradually becomes realized in all societies; especially in modern society。

In 1842; a third memoir appeared; entitled; 〃A Notice to Proprietors; or a Letter to M。 Victor Considerant; Editor of ‘La Phalange;' in Reply to a Defence of Property。〃  Here the influence of Adam Smith manifested itself; and was frankly admitted。  Did not Adam Smith find; in the principle of equality; the first of all the laws which govern wages?  There are other laws; undoubtedly; but Proudhon considers them all as springing from the principle of property; as he defined it in his first memoir。  Thus; in humanity; there are two principles;one which leads us to equality; another which separates us from it。  By the former; we treat each other as associates; by the latter; as strangers; not to say enemies。  This distinction; which is constantly met with throughout the three memoirs; contained already; in germ; the idea which gave birth to the 〃System of Economical Contradictions;〃 which appeared in 1846; the idea of antinomy or contre…loi。

The 〃Notice to Proprietors〃 was seized by the magistrates of Besancon; and Proudhon was summoned to appear before the assizes of Doubs within a week。  He read his written defence to the jurors in person; and was acquitted。  The jury; like M。 Blanqui; viewed him only as a philosopher; an inquirer; a savant。

In 1843; Proudhon published the 〃Creation of Order in Humanity;〃 a large volume; which does not deal exclusively with questions of social economy。  Religion; philosophy; method; certainty; logic; and dialectics are treated at considerable length。

Released from his printing…office on the 1st of March of the same year; Proudhon had to look for a chance to earn his living。  Messrs。 Gauthier Bros。; carriers by water between Mulhouse and Lyons; the eldest of whom was Proudhon's companion in childhood; conceived the happy thought of employing him; of utilizing his ability in their business; and in settling the numerous points of difficulty which daily arose。  Besides the large number of accounts which his new duties required him to make out; and which retarded the publication of the 〃System of Economical Contradictions;〃 until October; 1846; we ought to mention a work; which; before it appeared in pamphlet form; was published in the 〃Revue des Economistes;〃〃Competition between Railroads and Navigable Ways。〃

〃Le Miserere; or the Repentance of a King;〃 which he published in March; 1845; in the 〃Revue Independante;〃 during that Lenten season when Lacordaire was preaching in Lyons; proves that; though devoting himself with ardor to the study of economical problems; Proudhon had not lost his interest in questions of religious history。  Among his writings on these questions; which he was unfortunately obliged to leave unfinished; we may mention a nearly completed history of the early Christian heresies; and of the struggle of Christianity against Caesarism。

We have said that; in 1848; Proudhon recognized three masters。  Having no knowledge of the German language; he could not have read the works of Hegel; which at that time had not been translated into French。  It was Charles Grun; a German; who had come to France to study the various philosophical and socialistic systems; who gave him the substance of the Hegelian ideas。  During the winter of 1844…45; Charles Grun had some long conversations with Proudhon; which determined; very decisively; not the ideas; which belonged exclusively to the bisontin thinker; but the form of the important work on which he labored after 1843; and which was published in 1846 by Guillaumin。

Hegel's great idea; which Proudhon appropriated; and which he demonstrates with wonderful ability in the 〃System of Economical Contradictions;〃 is as follows:  Antinomy; that is; the existence of two laws or tendencies which are opposed to each other; is possible; not only with two different things; but with one and the same thing。  Considered in their thesis; that is; in the law or tendency which created them; all the economical categories are rational;competition; monopoly; the balance of trade; and property; as well as the division of labor; machinery; taxation; and credit。  But; like communism and population; all these categories are antinomical; all are opposed; not only to each other; but to themselves。  All is opposition; and disorder is born of this system of opposition。  Hence; the sub…title of the work;〃Philosophy of Misery。〃  No category can be suppressed; the opposition; antinomy; or contre…tendance; which exists in each of them; cannot be suppressed。

Where; then; lies the solution of the social problem?  Influenced by the Hegelian ideas; Proudhon began to look for it in a superior synthesis; which should reconcile the thesis and antithesis。  Afterwards; while at work upon his book on 〃Justice;〃 he saw that the antinomical terms do not cancel each other; any more than the opposite poles of an electric pile destroy each other; that they are the procreative cause of motion; life; and progress; that the problem is to discover; not their fusion; which would be death; but their equilibrium;an equilibrium for ever unstable; varying with the development of society。

On the cover of the 〃System of Economical Contradictions;〃 Proudhon announced; as soon to appear; his 〃Solution of the Social Problem。〃  This work; upon which he was engaged when the Revolution of 1848 broke out; had to be cut up into pamphlets and newspaper articles。  The two pamphlets; which he published in March; 1848; before he became editor of 〃Le Representant du Peuple;〃 bear the same title;〃Solution of the Social Problem。〃  The first; which is mainly a criticism of the early acts of the provisional government; is notable from the fact that in it Proudhon; in advance of all others; energetically opposed the establishment of national workshops。  The second; 〃Organization of Credit and Circulation;〃 sums up in a few pages his idea of economical progress: a gradual reduction of interest; profit; rent; taxes; and wages。  All progress hitherto has been made in this manner; in this manner it must continue to be made。  Those workingmen who favor a nominal increase of wages are; unconsciously。  following a back…track; opposed to all their interests。

After having published in 〃Le Representant du Peuple;〃 the statutes of the Bank of Exchange;a bank which was to make no profits; since it was to have no stockholders; and which; consequently; was to discount commercial paper with out interest; charging only a commission sufficient to defray its running expenses;Proudhon endeavored; in a number of articles; to explain its mechanism and necessity。  These articles have been collected in one volume; under the double title; 〃Resume of the Social Question; Bank of Exchange。〃  His other articles; those which up to December; 1848; were inspired by the progress of events; have been collected in another volume;〃Revolutionary Ideas。〃

Almost unknown in March; 1848; and struck off in April from the list of candidates for the Constituent Assembly by the delegation of workingmen which sat at the Luxembourg; Proudhon had but a very small number of votes at the general elections of April。  At the complementary elections; which were held in the early days of June; he was elected in Paris by seventy…seven thousand votes。

After the fatal days of June; he published an article on le terme; which caused the first suspension of 〃Le Representant du Peuple。〃  It was at that time that he introduced a bill into the Assembly; which; being referred to the Committee on the Finances; drew forth; first; the report of M。 Thiers; and then the speech which Proudhon delivered; on the 31st of July; in reply to this report。  〃Le Representant du Peuple;〃 reappearing a few days later; he wrote; a propos of the law requiring journals to give bonds; his famous article on 〃The Malthusians〃 (August 10; 1848)。

Ten days afterwards; 〃Le Representant du Peuple;〃 again suspended; definitively ceased to appear。  〃Le Peuple;〃 of which he was the editor…in…chief; and the first number of which was issued in the early part of September; appeared weekly at first; for want of sufficient bonds; it afterwards appeared daily; with a double number once a week。  Before 〃Le Peuple〃 had obtained its first bond; Proudhon published a remarkable pamphlet on the 〃Right to Labor;〃a right which he denied in the form in which it was then affirmed。  It was during the same period that he proposed; at the Poissonniere banquet; his Toast to the Revolution。

Proudhon; who had been asked to preside at
小提示:按 回车 [Enter] 键 返回书目,按 ← 键 返回上一页, 按 → 键 进入下一页。 赞一下 添加书签加入书架