urgeois； these infamous writers； these dishonored men。 All these； Sire； hate you； and continue to support you only because they fear us。 Finish the work of our kings； wipe out aristocracy and privilege； consult with these faithful proletaires； with the nation； which alone can honor a sovereign and sincerely shout； ‘Long live the king！'〃
The rest of what I have to say； sir； is for you alone； others would not understand me。 You are； I perceive； a republican as well as an economist； and your patriotism revolts at the very idea of addressing to the authorities a petition in which the government of Louis Philippe should be tacitly recognized。 〃National workshops！ it were well to have such institutions established；〃 you think； 〃but patriotic hearts never will accept them from an aristocratic ministry； nor by the courtesy of a king。〃 Already； undoubtedly； your old prejudices have returned； and you now regard me only as a sophist； as ready to flatter the powers that be as to dishonor； by pushing them to an extreme； the principles of equality and universal fraternity。
What shall I say to you？ 。 。 。 That I should so lightly compromise the future of my theories； either this clever sophistry which is attributed to me must be at bottom a very trifling affair； or else my convictions must be so firm that they deprive me of free…will。
But； not to insist further on the necessity of a compromise between the executive power and the people； it seems to me； sir； that； in doubting my patriotism； you reason very capriciously； and that your judgments are exceedingly rash。 You； sir； ostensibly defending government and property； are allowed to be a republican； reformer； phalansterian； any thing you wish； I； on the contrary； demanding distinctly enough a slight reform in public economy； am foreordained a conservative； and likewise a friend of the dynasty。 I cannot explain myself more clearly。 So firm a believer am I in the philosophy of accomplished facts and the _statu quo_ of governmental forms that； instead of destroying that which exists and beginning over again the past； I prefer to render every thing legitimate by correcting it。 It is true that the corrections which I propose； though respecting the form； tend to finally change the nature of the things corrected。 Who denies it？ But it is precisely that which constitutes my system of _statu quo_。 I make no war upon symbols； figures； or phantoms。 I respect scarecrows； and bow before bugbears。 I ask； on the one hand； that property be left as it is； but that interest on all kinds of capital be gradually lowered and finally abolished； on the other hand； that the charter be maintained in its present shape； but that method be introduced into administration and politics。 That is all。 Nevertheless； submitting to all that is； though not satisfied with it； I endeavor to conform to the established order； and to render unto Caesar the things that are Caesar's。 Is it thought； for instance； that I love property？ 。 。 。 Very well； I am myself a proprietor and do homage to the right of increase； as is proved by the fact that I have creditors to whom I faithfully pay； every year； a large amount of interest。 The same with politics。 Since we are a monarchy； I would cry； 〃LONG LIVE THE KING；〃 rather than suffer death； which does not prevent me； however； from demanding that the irremovable； inviolable； and hereditary representative of the nation shall act with the proletaires against the privileged classes； in a word； that the king shall become the leader of the radical party。 Thereby we proletaires would gain every thing； and I am sure that； at this price； Louis Philippe might secure to his family the perpetual presidency of the republic。 And this is why I think so。
If there existed in France but one great functional inequality； the duty of the functionary being； from one end of the year to the other； to hold full court of savants； artists； soldiers； deputies； inspectors； &c。； it is evident that the expenses of the presidency then would be the national expenses； and that； through the reversion of the civil list to the mass of consumers； the great inequality of which I speak would form an exact equation with the whole nation。 Of this no economist needs a demonstration。 Consequently； there would be no more fear of cliques； courtiers； and appanages； since no new inequality could be established。 The king； as king； would have friends （unheard… of thing）； but no family。 His relatives or kinsmen；_agnats et cognats_；if they were fools； would be nothing to him； and in no case； with the exception of the heir apparent； would they have； even in court； more privileges than others。 No more nepotism； no more favor； no more baseness。 No one would go to court save when duty required； or when called by an honorable distinction； and as all conditions would be equal and all functions equally honored； there would be no other emulation than that of merit and virtue。 I wish the king of the French could say without shame； 〃My brother the gardener； my sister…in…law the milk…maid； my son the prince…royal； and my son the blacksmith。〃 His daughter might well be an artist。 That would be beautiful； sir； that would be royal； no one but a buffoon could fail to understand it。
In this way； I have come to think that the forms of royalty may be made to harmonize with the requirements of equality； and have given a monarchical form to my republican spirit。 I have seen that France contains by no means as many democrats as is generally supposed； and I have compromised with the monarchy。 I do not say； however； that； if France wanted a republic； I could not accommodate myself equally well； and perhaps better。 By nature； I hate all signs of distinction； crosses of honor； gold lace； liveries； costumes； honorary titles； &c。； and； above all； parades。 If I had my way； no general should be distinguished from a soldier； nor a peer of France from a peasant。 Why have I never taken part in a review？ for I am happy to say； sir； that I am a national guard； I have nothing else in the world but that。 Because the review is always held at a place which I do not like； and because they have fools for officers whom I am compelled to obey。 You see；and this is not the best of my history；that； in spite of my conservative opinions； my life is a perpetual sacrifice to the republic。
Nevertheless； I doubt if such simplicity would be agreeable to French vanity； to that inordinate love of distinction and flattery which makes our nation the most frivolous in the world。 M。 Lamartine； in his grand 〃Meditation on Bonaparte；〃 calls the French A NATION OF BRUTUSES。 We are merely a nation of Narcissuses。 Previous to '89； we had the aristocracy of blood； then every bourgeois looked down upon the commonalty； and wished to be a nobleman。 Afterwards； distinction was based on wealth； and the bourgeoisie jealous of the nobility； and proud of their money； used 1830 to promote； not liberty by any means； but the aristocracy of wealth。 When； through the force of events； and the natural laws of society； for the development of which France offers such free play； equality shall be established in functions and fortunes； then the beaux and the belles； the savants and the artists； will form new classes。 There is a universal and innate desire in this Gallic country for fame and glory。 We must have distinctions； be they what they may； nobility； wealth； talent； beauty； or dress。 I suspect MM。 Arage and Garnier…Pages of having aristocratic manners； and I picture to myself our great journalists； in their columns so friendly to the people； administering rough kicks to the compositors in their printing offices。
〃This man；〃 once said 〃Le National〃 in speaking of Carrel； 〃whom we had proclaimed FIRST CONSUL！ 。 。 。 Is it not true that the monarchical principle still lives in the hearts of our democrats； and that they want universal suffrage in order to make themselves kings？ Since 〃Le National〃 prides itself on holding more fixed opinions than 〃Le Journal des Debats；〃 I presume that； Armand Carrel being dead； M。 Armand Marrast is now first consul； and M。 Garnier…Pages second consul。 In every thing the deputy must give way to the journalist。 I do not speak of M。 Arago； whom I believe to be； in spite of calumny； too learned for the consulship。 Be it so。 Though we have consuls； our position is not much altered。 I am ready to yield my share of sovereignty to MM。 Armand Marrast and Garnier…Pages； the appointed consuls； provided they will swear on entering upon the duties of their office； to abolish property and not be haughty。
Forever promises！ Forever oaths！ Why should the people trust in tribunes； when kings perjure themselves？ Alas！ truth and honesty are no longer； as in the days of King John； in the mouth of princes。 A whole senate has been convicted of felony； and； the interest of the governors always being； for some mysterious reason； opposed to the interest of the governed； parliaments follow each other while the nation dies of hunger。 No； no！ No more protectors； no more emperors； no more consuls。 Better manage our affairs ourselves than through agents。 Better associate our industries than beg from monopolies； and； since the republic cannot dispense with virtues； we should labor for our reform。
This； therefore； is my line of conduct。 I preach emancipation to the proletaires； association to the laborers； equality to the wealthy。 I push forward the revolution by all means in my power；the tongue； the pen； the press； by action； and example。 My life is a continual apostleship。
Yes； I am a reformer； I say it as I think it； in good faith； and that I may be no longer reproached for my vanity。 I wish to convert the world。 Very likely this fancy springs from an enthusiastic pride which may have turned to delirium； but it will be admitted at least that I have plenty of company； and that my madness is not monomania。 At the present day； everybody wishes to be reckoned among the lunatics of Beranger。 To say nothing of the Babeufs； the Marats； and the Robespierres； who swarm in our streets and workshops； all the great reformers of antiquity live again in the most illustrious personages of our time。 One is Jesus Christ； another Moses； a third Mahomet；