contain¡¡some¡¡of¡¡the¡¡elements¡¡requisite¡¡to¡¡form¡¡a¡¡complete
definition¡£¡¡If¡¡a¡¡conception¡¡could¡¡not¡¡be¡¡employed¡¡in¡¡reasoning
before¡¡it¡¡had¡¡been¡¡defined£»¡¡it¡¡would¡¡fare¡¡ill¡¡with¡¡all¡¡philosophical
thought¡£¡¡But£»¡¡as¡¡incompletely¡¡defined¡¡conceptions¡¡may¡¡always¡¡be
employed¡¡without¡¡detriment¡¡to¡¡truth£»¡¡so¡¡far¡¡as¡¡our¡¡analysis¡¡of¡¡the
elements¡¡contained¡¡in¡¡them¡¡proceeds£»¡¡imperfect¡¡definitions£»¡¡that¡¡is£»
propositions¡¡which¡¡are¡¡properly¡¡not¡¡definitions£»¡¡but¡¡merely
approximations¡¡thereto£»¡¡may¡¡be¡¡used¡¡with¡¡great¡¡advantage¡£¡¡In
mathematics£»¡¡definition¡¡belongs¡¡ad¡¡esse£»¡¡in¡¡philosophy¡¡ad¡¡melius¡¡esse¡£
It¡¡is¡¡a¡¡difficult¡¡task¡¡to¡¡construct¡¡a¡¡proper¡¡definition¡£¡¡Jurists¡¡are
still¡¡without¡¡a¡¡complete¡¡definition¡¡of¡¡the¡¡idea¡¡of¡¡right¡£
¡¡¡¡£¨b£©¡¡Mathematical¡¡definitions¡¡cannot¡¡be¡¡erroneous¡£¡¡For¡¡the¡¡conception
is¡¡given¡¡only¡¡in¡¡and¡¡through¡¡the¡¡definition£»¡¡and¡¡thus¡¡it¡¡contains¡¡only
what¡¡has¡¡been¡¡cogitated¡¡in¡¡the¡¡definition¡£¡¡But¡¡although¡¡a¡¡definition
cannot¡¡be¡¡incorrect£»¡¡as¡¡regards¡¡its¡¡content£»¡¡an¡¡error¡¡may¡¡sometimes£»
although¡¡seldom£»¡¡creep¡¡into¡¡the¡¡form¡£¡¡This¡¡error¡¡consists¡¡in¡¡a¡¡want¡¡of
precision¡£¡¡Thus¡¡the¡¡common¡¡definition¡¡of¡¡a¡¡circle¡¡¡that¡¡it¡¡is¡¡a¡¡curved
line£»¡¡every¡¡point¡¡in¡¡which¡¡is¡¡equally¡¡distant¡¡from¡¡another¡¡point
called¡¡the¡¡centre¡¡¡is¡¡faulty£»¡¡from¡¡the¡¡fact¡¡that¡¡the¡¡determination
indicated¡¡by¡¡the¡¡word¡¡curved¡¡is¡¡superfluous¡£¡¡For¡¡there¡¡ought¡¡to¡¡be¡¡a
particular¡¡theorem£»¡¡which¡¡may¡¡be¡¡easily¡¡proved¡¡from¡¡the¡¡definition£»¡¡to
the¡¡effect¡¡that¡¡every¡¡line£»¡¡which¡¡has¡¡all¡¡its¡¡points¡¡at¡¡equal
distances¡¡from¡¡another¡¡point£»¡¡must¡¡be¡¡a¡¡curved¡¡line¡¡¡that¡¡is£»¡¡that¡¡not
even¡¡the¡¡smallest¡¡part¡¡of¡¡it¡¡can¡¡be¡¡straight¡£¡¡Analytical
definitions£»¡¡on¡¡the¡¡other¡¡hand£»¡¡may¡¡be¡¡erroneous¡¡in¡¡many¡¡respects£»
either¡¡by¡¡the¡¡introduction¡¡of¡¡signs¡¡which¡¡do¡¡not¡¡actually¡¡exist¡¡in¡¡the
conception£»¡¡or¡¡by¡¡wanting¡¡in¡¡that¡¡completeness¡¡which¡¡forms¡¡the
essential¡¡of¡¡a¡¡definition¡£¡¡In¡¡the¡¡latter¡¡case£»¡¡the¡¡definition¡¡is
necessarily¡¡defective£»¡¡because¡¡we¡¡can¡¡never¡¡be¡¡fully¡¡certain¡¡of¡¡the
completeness¡¡of¡¡our¡¡analysis¡£¡¡For¡¡these¡¡reasons£»¡¡the¡¡method¡¡of
definition¡¡employed¡¡in¡¡mathematics¡¡cannot¡¡be¡¡imitated¡¡in¡¡philosophy¡£
¡¡¡¡2¡£¡¡Of¡¡Axioms¡£¡¡These£»¡¡in¡¡so¡¡far¡¡as¡¡they¡¡are¡¡immediately¡¡certain£»
are¡¡a¡¡priori¡¡synthetical¡¡principles¡£¡¡Now£»¡¡one¡¡conception¡¡cannot¡¡be
connected¡¡synthetically¡¡and¡¡yet¡¡immediately¡¡with¡¡another£»¡¡because£»
if¡¡we¡¡wish¡¡to¡¡proceed¡¡out¡¡of¡¡and¡¡beyond¡¡a¡¡conception£»¡¡a¡¡third
mediating¡¡cognition¡¡is¡¡necessary¡£¡¡And£»¡¡as¡¡philosophy¡¡is¡¡a¡¡cognition¡¡of
reason¡¡by¡¡the¡¡aid¡¡of¡¡conceptions¡¡alone£»¡¡there¡¡is¡¡to¡¡be¡¡found¡¡in¡¡it
no¡¡principle¡¡which¡¡deserves¡¡to¡¡be¡¡called¡¡an¡¡axiom¡£¡¡Mathematics£»¡¡on¡¡the
other¡¡hand£»¡¡may¡¡possess¡¡axioms£»¡¡because¡¡it¡¡can¡¡always¡¡connect¡¡the
predicates¡¡of¡¡an¡¡object¡¡a¡¡priori£»¡¡and¡¡without¡¡any¡¡mediating¡¡term£»¡¡by
means¡¡of¡¡the¡¡construction¡¡of¡¡conceptions¡¡in¡¡intuition¡£¡¡Such¡¡is¡¡the
case¡¡with¡¡the¡¡proposition£º¡¡Three¡¡points¡¡can¡¡always¡¡lie¡¡in¡¡a¡¡plane¡£
On¡¡the¡¡other¡¡hand£»¡¡no¡¡synthetical¡¡principle¡¡which¡¡is¡¡based¡¡upon
conceptions£»¡¡can¡¡ever¡¡be¡¡immediately¡¡certain¡¡£¨for¡¡example£»¡¡the
proposition£º¡¡Everything¡¡that¡¡happens¡¡has¡¡a¡¡cause£©£»¡¡because¡¡I¡¡require¡¡a
mediating¡¡term¡¡to¡¡connect¡¡the¡¡two¡¡conceptions¡¡of¡¡event¡¡and¡¡cause¡
namely£»¡¡the¡¡condition¡¡of¡¡time¡determination¡¡in¡¡an¡¡experience£»¡¡and¡¡I
cannot¡¡cognize¡¡any¡¡such¡¡principle¡¡immediately¡¡and¡¡from¡¡conceptions
alone¡£¡¡Discursive¡¡principles¡¡are£»¡¡accordingly£»¡¡very¡¡different¡¡from
intuitive¡¡principles¡¡or¡¡axioms¡£¡¡The¡¡former¡¡always¡¡require¡¡deduction£»
which¡¡in¡¡the¡¡case¡¡of¡¡the¡¡latter¡¡may¡¡be¡¡altogether¡¡dispensed¡¡with¡£
Axioms¡¡are£»¡¡for¡¡this¡¡reason£»¡¡always¡¡self¡evident£»¡¡while
philosophical¡¡principles£»¡¡whatever¡¡may¡¡be¡¡the¡¡degree¡¡of¡¡certainty¡¡they
possess£»¡¡cannot¡¡lay¡¡any¡¡claim¡¡to¡¡such¡¡a¡¡distinction¡£¡¡No¡¡synthetical
proposition¡¡of¡¡pure¡¡transcendental¡¡reason¡¡can¡¡be¡¡so¡¡evident£»¡¡as¡¡is
often¡¡rashly¡¡enough¡¡declared£»¡¡as¡¡the¡¡statement£»¡¡twice¡¡two¡¡are¡¡four¡£¡¡It
is¡¡true¡¡that¡¡in¡¡the¡¡Analytic¡¡I¡¡introduced¡¡into¡¡the¡¡list¡¡of
principles¡¡of¡¡the¡¡pure¡¡understanding£»¡¡certain¡¡axioms¡¡of¡¡intuition£»¡¡but
the¡¡principle¡¡there¡¡discussed¡¡was¡¡not¡¡itself¡¡an¡¡axiom£»¡¡but¡¡served
merely¡¡to¡¡present¡¡the¡¡principle¡¡of¡¡the¡¡possibility¡¡of¡¡axioms¡¡in
general£»¡¡while¡¡it¡¡was¡¡really¡¡nothing¡¡more¡¡than¡¡a¡¡principle¡¡based
upon¡¡conceptions¡£¡¡For¡¡it¡¡is¡¡one¡¡part¡¡of¡¡the¡¡duty¡¡of¡¡transcendental
philosophy¡¡to¡¡establish¡¡the¡¡possibility¡¡of¡¡mathematics¡¡itself¡£
Philosophy¡¡possesses£»¡¡then£»¡¡no¡¡axioms£»¡¡and¡¡has¡¡no¡¡right¡¡to¡¡impose
its¡¡a¡¡priori¡¡principles¡¡upon¡¡thought£»¡¡until¡¡it¡¡has¡¡established¡¡their
authority¡¡and¡¡validity¡¡by¡¡a¡¡thoroughgoing¡¡deduction¡£
¡¡¡¡3¡£¡¡Of¡¡Demonstrations¡£¡¡Only¡¡an¡¡apodeictic¡¡proof£»¡¡based¡¡upon
intuition£»¡¡can¡¡be¡¡termed¡¡a¡¡demonstration¡£¡¡Experience¡¡teaches¡¡us¡¡what
is£»¡¡but¡¡it¡¡cannot¡¡convince¡¡us¡¡that¡¡it¡¡might¡¡not¡¡have¡¡been¡¡otherwise¡£
Hence¡¡a¡¡proof¡¡upon¡¡empirical¡¡grounds¡¡cannot¡¡be¡¡apodeictic¡£¡¡A¡¡priori
conceptions£»¡¡in¡¡discursive¡¡cognition£»¡¡can¡¡never¡¡produce¡¡intuitive
certainty¡¡or¡¡evidence£»¡¡however¡¡certain¡¡the¡¡judgement¡¡they¡¡present
may¡¡be¡£¡¡Mathematics¡¡alone£»¡¡therefore£»¡¡contains¡¡demonstrations£»¡¡because
it¡¡does¡¡not¡¡deduce¡¡its¡¡cognition¡¡from¡¡conceptions£»¡¡but¡¡from¡¡the
construction¡¡of¡¡conceptions£»¡¡that¡¡is£»¡¡from¡¡intuition£»¡¡which¡¡can¡¡be
given¡¡a¡¡priori¡¡in¡¡accordance¡¡with¡¡conceptions¡£¡¡The¡¡method¡¡of
algebra£»¡¡in¡¡equations£»¡¡from¡¡which¡¡the¡¡correct¡¡answer¡¡is¡¡deduced¡¡by
reduction£»¡¡is¡¡a¡¡kind¡¡of¡¡construction¡¡¡not¡¡geometrical£»¡¡but¡¡by¡¡symbols¡
in¡¡which¡¡all¡¡conceptions£»¡¡especially¡¡those¡¡of¡¡the¡¡relations¡¡of
quantities£»¡¡are¡¡represented¡¡in¡¡intuition¡¡by¡¡signs£»¡¡and¡¡thus¡¡the
conclusions¡¡in¡¡that¡¡science¡¡are¡¡secured¡¡from¡¡errors¡¡by¡¡the¡¡fact¡¡that
every¡¡proof¡¡is¡¡submitted¡¡to¡¡ocular¡¡evidence¡£¡¡Philosophical¡¡cognition
does¡¡not¡¡possess¡¡this¡¡advantage£»¡¡it¡¡being¡¡required¡¡to¡¡consider¡¡the
general¡¡always¡¡in¡¡abstracto¡¡£¨by¡¡means¡¡of¡¡conceptions£©£»¡¡while
mathematics¡¡can¡¡always¡¡consider¡¡it¡¡in¡¡concreto¡¡£¨in¡¡an¡¡individual
intuition£©£»¡¡and¡¡at¡¡the¡¡same¡¡time¡¡by¡¡means¡¡of¡¡a¡¡priori
representation£»¡¡whereby¡¡all¡¡errors¡¡are¡¡rendered¡¡manifest¡¡to¡¡the
senses¡£¡¡The¡¡former¡¡¡discursive¡¡proofs¡¡¡ought¡¡to¡¡be¡¡termed¡¡acroamatic
proofs£»¡¡rather¡¡than¡¡demonstrations£»¡¡as¡¡only¡¡words¡¡are¡¡employed¡¡in
them£»¡¡while¡¡demonstrations¡¡proper£»¡¡as¡¡the¡¡term¡¡itself¡¡indicates£»
always¡¡require¡¡a¡¡reference¡¡to¡¡the¡¡intuition¡¡of¡¡the¡¡object¡£
¡¡¡¡It¡¡follows¡¡from¡¡all¡¡these¡¡considerations¡¡that¡¡it¡¡is¡¡not¡¡consonant
with¡¡the¡¡nature¡¡of¡¡philosophy£»¡¡especially¡¡in¡¡the¡¡sphere¡¡of¡¡pure
reason£»¡¡to¡¡employ¡¡the¡¡dogmatical¡¡method£»¡¡and¡¡to¡¡adorn¡¡itself¡¡with
the¡¡titles¡¡and¡¡insignia¡¡of¡¡mathematical¡¡science¡£¡¡It¡¡does¡¡not¡¡belong¡¡to
that¡¡order£»¡¡and¡¡can¡¡only¡¡hope¡¡for¡¡a¡¡fraternal¡¡union¡¡with¡¡that¡¡science¡£
Its¡¡attempts¡¡at¡¡mathematical¡¡evidence¡¡are¡¡vain¡¡pretensions£»¡¡which
can¡¡only¡¡keep¡¡it¡¡back¡¡from¡¡its¡¡true¡¡aim£»¡¡which¡¡is¡¡to¡¡detect¡¡the
illusory¡¡procedure¡¡of¡¡reason¡¡when¡¡transgressing¡¡its¡¡proper¡¡limits£»¡¡and
by¡¡fully¡¡explaining¡¡and¡¡analysing¡¡our¡¡conceptions£»¡¡to¡¡conduct¡¡us
from¡¡the¡¡dim¡¡regions¡¡of¡¡speculation¡¡to¡¡the¡¡clear¡¡region¡¡of¡¡modest
self¡knowledge¡£¡¡Reason¡¡must¡¡not£»¡¡therefore£»¡¡in¡¡its¡¡transcendental
endeavours£»¡¡look¡¡forward¡¡with¡¡such¡¡confidence£»¡¡as¡¡if¡¡the¡¡path¡¡it¡¡is
pursuing¡¡led¡¡straight¡¡to¡¡its¡¡aim£»¡¡nor¡¡reckon¡¡with¡¡such¡¡security¡¡upon
its¡¡premisses£»¡¡as¡¡to¡¡consider¡¡it¡¡unnecessary¡¡to¡¡take¡¡a¡¡step¡¡back£»¡¡or
to¡¡keep¡¡a¡¡strict¡¡watch¡¡for¡¡errors£»¡¡which£»¡¡overlooked¡¡in¡¡the
principles£»¡¡may¡¡be¡¡detected¡¡in¡¡the¡¡arguments¡¡themselves¡¡¡in¡¡which¡¡case
it¡¡may¡¡be¡¡requisite¡¡either¡¡to¡¡determine¡¡these¡¡principles¡¡with
greater¡¡strictness£»¡¡or¡¡to¡¡change¡¡them¡¡entirely¡£
¡¡¡¡I¡¡divide¡¡all¡¡apodeictic¡¡propositions£»¡¡whether¡¡demonstrable¡¡or
immediately¡¡certain£»¡¡into¡¡dogmata¡¡and¡¡mathemata¡£¡¡A¡¡direct
synthetical¡¡proposition£»¡¡based¡¡on¡¡conceptions£»¡¡is¡¡a¡¡dogma£»¡¡a
proposition¡¡of¡¡the¡¡same¡¡kind£»¡¡based¡¡on¡¡the¡¡construction¡¡of
conceptions£»¡¡is¡¡a¡¡mathema¡£¡¡Analytical¡¡judgements¡¡do¡¡not¡¡teach¡¡us¡¡any
more¡¡about¡¡an¡¡object¡¡than¡¡what¡¡was¡¡contained¡¡in¡¡the¡¡conception¡¡we
had¡¡of¡¡it£»¡¡because¡¡they¡¡do¡¡not¡¡extend¡¡our¡¡cognition¡¡beyond¡¡our
conception¡¡of¡¡an¡¡object£»¡¡they¡¡merely¡¡elucidate¡¡the¡¡conception¡£¡¡They
cannot¡¡therefore¡¡be¡¡with¡¡propriety¡¡termed¡¡dogmas¡£¡¡Of¡¡the¡¡two¡¡kinds
of¡¡a¡¡priori¡¡synthetical¡¡propositions¡¡above¡¡mentioned£»¡¡only¡¡those¡¡which
are¡¡employed¡¡in¡¡philosophy¡¡can£»¡¡according¡¡to¡¡the¡¡general¡¡mode¡¡of
speech£»¡¡bear¡¡this¡¡name£»¡¡those¡¡of¡¡arithmetic¡¡or¡¡geometry¡¡would¡¡not¡¡be
rightly¡¡so¡¡denominated¡£¡¡Thus¡¡the¡¡customary¡¡mode¡¡of¡¡speaking¡¡confirms
the¡¡explanation¡¡given¡¡above£»¡¡and¡¡the¡¡conclusion¡¡arrived¡¡at£»¡¡that
only¡¡those¡¡judgements¡¡which¡¡are¡¡based¡¡upon¡¡conceptions£»¡¡not¡¡on¡¡the
construction¡¡of¡¡conceptions£»¡¡can¡¡be¡¡termed¡¡dogmatical¡£
¡¡¡¡Thus£»¡¡pure¡¡reason£»¡¡in¡¡the¡¡sphere¡¡of¡¡speculation£»¡¡does¡¡not¡¡contain
a¡¡single¡¡direct¡¡synthetical¡¡judgement¡¡based¡¡upon¡¡conceptions¡£¡¡By¡¡means
of¡¡ideas£»¡¡it¡¡is£»¡¡as¡¡we¡¡have¡¡shown£»¡¡incapable¡¡of¡¡producing
synthetical¡¡judgements£»¡¡which¡¡are¡¡objectively¡¡valid£»¡¡by¡¡means¡¡of¡¡the
conceptions¡¡of¡¡the¡¡understanding£»¡¡it¡¡establishes¡¡certain¡¡indubitable
principles£»¡¡not£»¡¡however£»¡¡directly¡¡on¡¡the¡¡basis¡¡of¡¡conceptions£»¡¡but
only¡¡indirectly¡¡by¡¡means¡¡of¡¡the¡¡relation¡¡of¡¡these¡¡conceptions¡¡to
something¡¡of¡¡a¡¡purely¡¡contingent¡¡nature£»¡¡namely£»¡¡possible
experience¡£¡¡When¡¡experience¡¡is¡¡presupposed£»¡¡these¡¡principles¡¡are
apodeictically¡¡certain£»¡¡but¡¡in¡¡themselves£»¡¡and¡¡directly£»¡¡they¡¡cannot
even¡¡be¡¡cognized¡¡a¡¡priori¡£¡¡Thus¡¡the¡¡given¡¡conceptions¡¡of¡¡cause¡¡and
event¡¡will¡¡not¡¡be¡¡sufficient¡¡for¡¡the¡¡demonstration¡¡of¡¡the¡¡proposition£º
Every¡¡event¡¡has¡¡a¡¡cause¡£¡¡For¡¡this¡¡reason£»¡¡it¡¡is¡¡not¡¡a¡¡dogma£»
although¡¡from¡¡another¡¡point¡¡of¡¡view£»¡¡that¡¡of¡¡experience£»¡¡it¡¡is¡¡capable
of¡¡being¡¡proved¡¡to¡¡demonstration¡£¡¡The¡¡proper¡¡term¡¡for¡¡such¡¡a
proposition¡¡is¡¡principle£»¡¡and¡¡not¡¡theorem¡¡£¨although¡¡it¡¡does¡¡require¡¡to
be¡¡proved£©£»¡¡because¡¡it¡¡possesses¡¡the¡¡remarkable¡¡peculiarity¡¡of¡¡being
the¡¡condition¡¡of¡¡the¡¡possibility¡¡of¡¡its¡¡own¡¡ground¡¡of¡¡proof£»¡¡that
is£»¡¡experience£»¡¡and¡¡of¡¡forming¡¡a¡¡necessary¡¡presupposition¡¡in¡¡all
empirical¡¡observation¡£
¡¡¡¡If¡¡then£»¡¡in¡¡the¡¡speculative¡¡sphere¡¡of¡¡pure¡¡reason£»¡¡no¡¡dogmata¡¡are¡¡to
be¡¡found£»¡¡all¡¡dogmatical¡¡methods£»¡¡whether¡¡borrowed¡¡from¡¡mathematics£»
or¡¡invented¡¡by¡¡philosophical¡¡thinkers£»¡¡are¡¡alike¡¡inappropriate¡¡and
inefficient¡£¡¡They¡¡only¡¡serve¡¡to¡¡conceal¡¡errors¡¡and¡¡fallacies£»¡¡and¡¡to
deceive¡¡philosophy£»¡¡whose¡¡duty¡¡it¡¡is¡¡to¡¡see¡¡that¡¡reason¡¡pursues¡¡a¡¡safe
and¡¡straight¡¡path¡£¡¡A
СÌáʾ£º°´ »Ø³µ [Enter] ¼ü ·µ»ØÊéÄ¿£¬°´ ¡û ¼ü ·µ»ØÉÏÒ»Ò³£¬ °´ ¡ú ¼ü ½øÈëÏÂÒ»Ò³¡£
ÔÞÒ»ÏÂ
Ìí¼ÓÊéÇ©¼ÓÈëÊé¼Ü