conception¡¡is¡¡necessary¡¡to¡¡restrain¡¡sensuous¡¡intuition¡¡within¡¡the
bounds¡¡of¡¡phenomena£»¡¡and¡¡thus¡¡to¡¡limit¡¡the¡¡objective¡¡validity¡¡of
sensuous¡¡cognition£»¡¡for¡¡things¡¡in¡¡themselves£»¡¡which¡¡lie¡¡beyond¡¡its
province£»¡¡are¡¡called¡¡noumena¡¡for¡¡the¡¡very¡¡purpose¡¡of¡¡indicating¡¡that
this¡¡cognition¡¡does¡¡not¡¡extend¡¡its¡¡application¡¡to¡¡all¡¡that¡¡the
understanding¡¡thinks¡£¡¡But£»¡¡after¡¡all£»¡¡the¡¡possibility¡¡of¡¡such
noumena¡¡is¡¡quite¡¡incomprehensible£»¡¡and¡¡beyond¡¡the¡¡sphere¡¡of¡¡phenomena£»
all¡¡is¡¡for¡¡us¡¡a¡¡mere¡¡void£»¡¡that¡¡is¡¡to¡¡say£»¡¡we¡¡possess¡¡an¡¡understanding
whose¡¡province¡¡does¡¡problematically¡¡extend¡¡beyond¡¡this¡¡sphere£»¡¡but
we¡¡do¡¡not¡¡possess¡¡an¡¡intuition£»¡¡indeed£»¡¡not¡¡even¡¡the¡¡conception¡¡of¡¡a
possible¡¡intuition£»¡¡by¡¡means¡¡of¡¡which¡¡objects¡¡beyond¡¡the¡¡region¡¡of
sensibility¡¡could¡¡be¡¡given¡¡us£»¡¡and¡¡in¡¡reference¡¡to¡¡which¡¡the
understanding¡¡might¡¡be¡¡employed¡¡assertorically¡£¡¡The¡¡conception¡¡of¡¡a
noumenon¡¡is¡¡therefore¡¡merely¡¡a¡¡limitative¡¡conception¡¡and¡¡therefore
only¡¡of¡¡negative¡¡use¡£¡¡But¡¡it¡¡is¡¡not¡¡an¡¡arbitrary¡¡or¡¡fictitious¡¡notion£»
but¡¡is¡¡connected¡¡with¡¡the¡¡limitation¡¡of¡¡sensibility£»¡¡without£»¡¡however£»
being¡¡capable¡¡of¡¡presenting¡¡us¡¡with¡¡any¡¡positive¡¡datum¡¡beyond¡¡this
sphere¡£
¡¡¡¡The¡¡division¡¡of¡¡objects¡¡into¡¡phenomena¡¡and¡¡noumena£»¡¡and¡¡of¡¡the¡¡world
into¡¡a¡¡mundus¡¡sensibilis¡¡and¡¡intelligibilis¡¡is¡¡therefore¡¡quite
inadmissible¡¡in¡¡a¡¡positive¡¡sense£»¡¡although¡¡conceptions¡¡do¡¡certainly
admit¡¡of¡¡such¡¡a¡¡division£»¡¡for¡¡the¡¡class¡¡of¡¡noumena¡¡have¡¡no¡¡determinate
object¡¡corresponding¡¡to¡¡them£»¡¡and¡¡cannot¡¡therefore¡¡possess¡¡objective
validity¡£¡¡If¡¡we¡¡abandon¡¡the¡¡senses£»¡¡how¡¡can¡¡it¡¡be¡¡made¡¡conceivable
that¡¡the¡¡categories¡¡£¨which¡¡are¡¡the¡¡only¡¡conceptions¡¡that¡¡could¡¡serve
as¡¡conceptions¡¡for¡¡noumena£©¡¡have¡¡any¡¡sense¡¡or¡¡meaning¡¡at¡¡all£»¡¡inasmuch
as¡¡something¡¡more¡¡than¡¡the¡¡mere¡¡unity¡¡of¡¡thought£»¡¡namely£»¡¡a¡¡possible
intuition£»¡¡is¡¡requisite¡¡for¡¡their¡¡application¡¡to¡¡an¡¡object£¿¡¡The
conception¡¡of¡¡a¡¡noumenon£»¡¡considered¡¡as¡¡merely¡¡problematical£»¡¡is£»
however£»¡¡not¡¡only¡¡admissible£»¡¡but£»¡¡as¡¡a¡¡limitative¡¡conception¡¡of
sensibility£»¡¡absolutely¡¡necessary¡£¡¡But£»¡¡in¡¡this¡¡case£»¡¡a¡¡noumenon¡¡is
not¡¡a¡¡particular¡¡intelligible¡¡object¡¡for¡¡our¡¡understanding£»¡¡on¡¡the
contrary£»¡¡the¡¡kind¡¡of¡¡understanding¡¡to¡¡which¡¡it¡¡could¡¡belong¡¡is¡¡itself
a¡¡problem£»¡¡for¡¡we¡¡cannot¡¡form¡¡the¡¡most¡¡distant¡¡conception¡¡of¡¡the
possibility¡¡of¡¡an¡¡understanding¡¡which¡¡should¡¡cognize¡¡an¡¡object£»¡¡not
discursively¡¡by¡¡means¡¡of¡¡categories£»¡¡but¡¡intuitively¡¡in¡¡a¡¡non¡sensuous
intuition¡£¡¡Our¡¡understanding¡¡attains¡¡in¡¡this¡¡way¡¡a¡¡sort¡¡of¡¡negative
extension¡£¡¡That¡¡is¡¡to¡¡say£»¡¡it¡¡is¡¡not¡¡limited¡¡by£»¡¡but¡¡rather¡¡limits£»
sensibility£»¡¡by¡¡giving¡¡the¡¡name¡¡of¡¡noumena¡¡to¡¡things£»¡¡not¡¡considered
as¡¡phenomena£»¡¡but¡¡as¡¡things¡¡in¡¡themselves¡£¡¡But¡¡it¡¡at¡¡the¡¡same¡¡time
prescribes¡¡limits¡¡to¡¡itself£»¡¡for¡¡it¡¡confesses¡¡itself¡¡unable¡¡to¡¡cognize
these¡¡by¡¡means¡¡of¡¡the¡¡categories£»¡¡and¡¡hence¡¡is¡¡compelled¡¡to¡¡cogitate
them¡¡merely¡¡as¡¡an¡¡unknown¡¡something¡£
¡¡¡¡I¡¡find£»¡¡however£»¡¡in¡¡the¡¡writings¡¡of¡¡modern¡¡authors£»¡¡an¡¡entirely
different¡¡use¡¡of¡¡the¡¡expressions£»¡¡mundus¡¡sensibilis¡¡and
intelligibilis£»¡¡which¡¡quite¡¡departs¡¡from¡¡the¡¡meaning¡¡of¡¡the
ancients¡¡¡an¡¡acceptation¡¡in¡¡which£»¡¡indeed£»¡¡there¡¡is¡¡to¡¡be¡¡found¡¡no
difficulty£»¡¡but¡¡which¡¡at¡¡the¡¡same¡¡time¡¡depends¡¡on¡¡mere¡¡verbal
quibbling¡£¡¡According¡¡to¡¡this¡¡meaning£»¡¡some¡¡have¡¡chosen¡¡to¡¡call¡¡the
complex¡¡of¡¡phenomena£»¡¡in¡¡so¡¡far¡¡as¡¡it¡¡is¡¡intuited£»¡¡mundus
sensibilis£»¡¡but¡¡in¡¡so¡¡far¡¡as¡¡the¡¡connection¡¡thereof¡¡is¡¡cogitated
according¡¡to¡¡general¡¡laws¡¡of¡¡thought£»¡¡mundus¡¡intelligibilis¡£
Astronomy£»¡¡in¡¡so¡¡far¡¡as¡¡we¡¡mean¡¡by¡¡the¡¡word¡¡the¡¡mere¡¡observation¡¡of
the¡¡starry¡¡heaven£»¡¡may¡¡represent¡¡the¡¡former£»¡¡a¡¡system¡¡of¡¡astronomy£»
such¡¡as¡¡the¡¡Copernican¡¡or¡¡Newtonian£»¡¡the¡¡latter¡£¡¡But¡¡such¡¡twisting
of¡¡words¡¡is¡¡a¡¡mere¡¡sophistical¡¡subterfuge£»¡¡to¡¡avoid¡¡a¡¡difficult
question£»¡¡by¡¡modifying¡¡its¡¡meaning¡¡to¡¡suit¡¡our¡¡own¡¡convenience¡£¡¡To
be¡¡sure£»¡¡understanding¡¡and¡¡reason¡¡are¡¡employed¡¡in¡¡the¡¡cognition¡¡of
phenomena£»¡¡but¡¡the¡¡question¡¡is£»¡¡whether¡¡these¡¡can¡¡be¡¡applied¡¡when
the¡¡object¡¡is¡¡not¡¡a¡¡phenomenon¡¡and¡¡in¡¡this¡¡sense¡¡we¡¡regard¡¡it¡¡if¡¡it¡¡is
cogitated¡¡as¡¡given¡¡to¡¡the¡¡understanding¡¡alone£»¡¡and¡¡not¡¡to¡¡the
senses¡£¡¡The¡¡question¡¡therefore¡¡is¡¡whether£»¡¡over¡¡and¡¡above¡¡the
empirical¡¡use¡¡of¡¡the¡¡understanding£»¡¡a¡¡transcendental¡¡use¡¡is
possible£»¡¡which¡¡applies¡¡to¡¡the¡¡noumenon¡¡as¡¡an¡¡object¡£¡¡This¡¡question¡¡we
have¡¡answered¡¡in¡¡the¡¡negative¡£
¡¡¡¡When¡¡therefore¡¡we¡¡say£»¡¡the¡¡senses¡¡represent¡¡objects¡¡as¡¡they
appear£»¡¡the¡¡understanding¡¡as¡¡they¡¡are£»¡¡the¡¡latter¡¡statement¡¡must¡¡not
be¡¡understood¡¡in¡¡a¡¡transcendental£»¡¡but¡¡only¡¡in¡¡an¡¡empirical
signification£»¡¡that¡¡is£»¡¡as¡¡they¡¡must¡¡be¡¡represented¡¡in¡¡the¡¡complete
connection¡¡of¡¡phenomena£»¡¡and¡¡not¡¡according¡¡to¡¡what¡¡they¡¡may¡¡be£»
apart¡¡from¡¡their¡¡relation¡¡to¡¡possible¡¡experience£»¡¡consequently¡¡not
as¡¡objects¡¡of¡¡the¡¡pure¡¡understanding¡£¡¡For¡¡this¡¡must¡¡ever¡¡remain
unknown¡¡to¡¡us¡£¡¡Nay£»¡¡it¡¡is¡¡also¡¡quite¡¡unknown¡¡to¡¡us¡¡whether¡¡any¡¡such
transcendental¡¡or¡¡extraordinary¡¡cognition¡¡is¡¡possible¡¡under¡¡any
circumstances£»¡¡at¡¡least£»¡¡whether¡¡it¡¡is¡¡possible¡¡by¡¡means¡¡of¡¡our
categories¡£¡¡Understanding¡¡and¡¡sensibility£»¡¡with¡¡us£»¡¡can¡¡determine
objects¡¡only¡¡in¡¡conjunction¡£¡¡If¡¡we¡¡separate¡¡them£»¡¡we¡¡have¡¡intuitions
without¡¡conceptions£»¡¡or¡¡conceptions¡¡without¡¡intuitions£»¡¡in¡¡both¡¡cases£»
representations£»¡¡which¡¡we¡¡cannot¡¡apply¡¡to¡¡any¡¡determinate¡¡object¡£
¡¡¡¡If£»¡¡after¡¡all¡¡our¡¡inquiries¡¡and¡¡explanations£»¡¡any¡¡one¡¡still
hesitates¡¡to¡¡abandon¡¡the¡¡mere¡¡transcendental¡¡use¡¡of¡¡the¡¡categories£»
let¡¡him¡¡attempt¡¡to¡¡construct¡¡with¡¡them¡¡a¡¡synthetical¡¡proposition¡£¡¡It
would£»¡¡of¡¡course£»¡¡be¡¡unnecessary¡¡for¡¡this¡¡purpose¡¡to¡¡construct¡¡an
analytical¡¡proposition£»¡¡for¡¡that¡¡does¡¡not¡¡extend¡¡the¡¡sphere¡¡of¡¡the
understanding£»¡¡but£»¡¡being¡¡concerned¡¡only¡¡about¡¡what¡¡is¡¡cogitated¡¡in
the¡¡conception¡¡itself£»¡¡it¡¡leaves¡¡it¡¡quite¡¡undecided¡¡whether¡¡the
conception¡¡has¡¡any¡¡relation¡¡to¡¡objects£»¡¡or¡¡merely¡¡indicates¡¡the
unity¡¡of¡¡thought¡¡¡complete¡¡abstraction¡¡being¡¡made¡¡of¡¡the¡¡modi¡¡in¡¡which
an¡¡object¡¡may¡¡be¡¡given£º¡¡in¡¡such¡¡a¡¡proposition£»¡¡it¡¡is¡¡sufficient¡¡for
the¡¡understanding¡¡to¡¡know¡¡what¡¡lies¡¡in¡¡the¡¡conception¡¡¡to¡¡what¡¡it
applies¡¡is¡¡to¡¡it¡¡indifferent¡£¡¡The¡¡attempt¡¡must¡¡therefore¡¡be¡¡made
with¡¡a¡¡synthetical¡¡and¡¡so¡called¡¡transcendental¡¡principle£»¡¡for
example£º¡¡¡¨Everything¡¡that¡¡exists£»¡¡exists¡¡as¡¡substance£»¡¨¡¡or£»
¡¨Everything¡¡that¡¡is¡¡contingent¡¡exists¡¡as¡¡an¡¡effect¡¡of¡¡some¡¡other
thing£»¡¡viz¡££»¡¡of¡¡its¡¡cause¡£¡¨¡¡Now¡¡I¡¡ask£»¡¡whence¡¡can¡¡the¡¡understanding
draw¡¡these¡¡synthetical¡¡propositions£»¡¡when¡¡the¡¡conceptions¡¡contained
therein¡¡do¡¡not¡¡relate¡¡to¡¡possible¡¡experience¡¡but¡¡to¡¡things¡¡in
themselves¡¡£¨noumena£©£¿¡¡Where¡¡is¡¡to¡¡be¡¡found¡¡the¡¡third¡¡term£»¡¡which¡¡is
always¡¡requisite¡¡PURE¡¡site¡¡in¡¡a¡¡synthetical¡¡proposition£»¡¡which¡¡may
connect¡¡in¡¡the¡¡same¡¡proposition¡¡conceptions¡¡which¡¡have¡¡no¡¡logical
£¨analytical£©¡¡connection¡¡with¡¡each¡¡other£¿¡¡The¡¡proposition¡¡never¡¡will¡¡be
demonstrated£»¡¡nay£»¡¡more£»¡¡the¡¡possibility¡¡of¡¡any¡¡such¡¡pure¡¡assertion
never¡¡can¡¡be¡¡shown£»¡¡without¡¡making¡¡reference¡¡to¡¡the¡¡empirical¡¡use¡¡of
the¡¡understanding£»¡¡and¡¡thus£»¡¡ipso¡¡facto£»¡¡completely¡¡renouncing¡¡pure
and¡¡non¡sensuous¡¡judgement¡£¡¡Thus¡¡the¡¡conception¡¡of¡¡pure¡¡and¡¡merely
intelligible¡¡objects¡¡is¡¡completely¡¡void¡¡of¡¡all¡¡principles¡¡of¡¡its
application£»¡¡because¡¡we¡¡cannot¡¡imagine¡¡any¡¡mode¡¡in¡¡which¡¡they¡¡might¡¡be
given£»¡¡and¡¡the¡¡problematical¡¡thought¡¡which¡¡leaves¡¡a¡¡place¡¡open¡¡for
them¡¡serves¡¡only£»¡¡like¡¡a¡¡void¡¡space£»¡¡to¡¡limit¡¡the¡¡use¡¡of¡¡empirical
principles£»¡¡without¡¡containing¡¡at¡¡the¡¡same¡¡time¡¡any¡¡other¡¡object¡¡of
cognition¡¡beyond¡¡their¡¡sphere¡£
APPENDIX
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡APPENDIX¡£
¡¡¡¡¡¡Of¡¡the¡¡Equivocal¡¡Nature¡¡or¡¡Amphiboly¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Conceptions¡¡of
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡Reflection¡¡from¡¡the¡¡Confusion¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Transcendental¡¡with
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡the¡¡Empirical¡¡use¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Understanding¡£
¡¡¡¡Reflection¡¡£¨reflexio£©¡¡is¡¡not¡¡occupied¡¡about¡¡objects¡¡themselves£»
for¡¡the¡¡purpose¡¡of¡¡directly¡¡obtaining¡¡conceptions¡¡of¡¡them£»¡¡but¡¡is¡¡that
state¡¡of¡¡the¡¡mind¡¡in¡¡which¡¡we¡¡set¡¡ourselves¡¡to¡¡discover¡¡the¡¡subjective
conditions¡¡under¡¡which¡¡we¡¡obtain¡¡conceptions¡£¡¡It¡¡is¡¡the
consciousness¡¡of¡¡the¡¡relation¡¡of¡¡given¡¡representations¡¡to¡¡the
different¡¡sources¡¡or¡¡faculties¡¡of¡¡cognition£»¡¡by¡¡which¡¡alone¡¡their
relation¡¡to¡¡each¡¡other¡¡can¡¡be¡¡rightly¡¡determined¡£¡¡The¡¡first¡¡question
which¡¡occurs¡¡in¡¡considering¡¡our¡¡representations¡¡is¡¡to¡¡what¡¡faculty
of¡¡cognition¡¡do¡¡they¡¡belong£¿¡¡To¡¡the¡¡understanding¡¡or¡¡to¡¡the¡¡senses£¿
Many¡¡judgements¡¡are¡¡admitted¡¡to¡¡be¡¡true¡¡from¡¡mere¡¡habit¡¡or
inclination£»¡¡but£»¡¡because¡¡reflection¡¡neither¡¡precedes¡¡nor¡¡follows£»
it¡¡is¡¡held¡¡to¡¡be¡¡a¡¡judgement¡¡that¡¡has¡¡its¡¡origin¡¡in¡¡the¡¡understanding¡£
All¡¡judgements¡¡do¡¡not¡¡require¡¡examination£»¡¡that¡¡is£»¡¡investigation¡¡into
the¡¡grounds¡¡of¡¡their¡¡truth¡£¡¡For£»¡¡when¡¡they¡¡are¡¡immediately¡¡certain
£¨for¡¡example£º¡¡¡¨Between¡¡two¡¡points¡¡there¡¡can¡¡be¡¡only¡¡one¡¡straight
line¡¨£©£»¡¡no¡¡better¡¡or¡¡less¡¡mediate¡¡test¡¡of¡¡their¡¡truth¡¡can¡¡be¡¡found
than¡¡that¡¡which¡¡they¡¡themselves¡¡contain¡¡and¡¡express¡£¡¡But¡¡all
judgement£»¡¡nay£»¡¡all¡¡comparisons¡¡require¡¡reflection£»¡¡that¡¡is£»¡¡a
distinction¡¡of¡¡the¡¡faculty¡¡of¡¡cognition¡¡to¡¡which¡¡the¡¡given¡¡conceptions
belong¡£¡¡The¡¡act¡¡whereby¡¡I¡¡compare¡¡my¡¡representations¡¡with¡¡the
faculty¡¡of¡¡cognition¡¡which¡¡originates¡¡them£»¡¡and¡¡whereby¡¡I
distinguish¡¡whether¡¡they¡¡are¡¡compared¡¡with¡¡each¡¡other¡¡as¡¡belonging
to¡¡the¡¡pure¡¡understanding¡¡or¡¡to¡¡sensuous¡¡intuition£»¡¡I¡¡term
transcendental¡¡reflection¡£¡¡Now£»¡¡the¡¡relations¡¡in¡¡which¡¡conceptions¡¡can
stand¡¡to¡¡each¡¡other¡¡are¡¡those¡¡of¡¡identity¡¡and¡¡difference£»¡¡agreement
and¡¡opposition£»¡¡of¡¡the¡¡internal¡¡and¡¡external£»¡¡finally£»¡¡of¡¡the
determinable¡¡and¡¡the¡¡determining¡¡£¨matter¡¡and¡¡form£©¡£¡¡The¡¡proper
determination¡¡of¡¡these¡¡relations¡¡rests¡¡on¡¡the¡¡question£»¡¡to¡¡what
faculty¡¡of¡¡cognition¡¡they¡¡subjectively¡¡belong£»¡¡whether¡¡to
sensibility¡¡or¡¡understanding£¿¡¡For£»¡¡on¡¡the¡¡manner¡¡in¡¡which¡¡we¡¡solve
this¡¡question¡¡depends¡¡the¡¡manner¡¡in¡¡which¡¡we¡¡must¡¡cogitate¡¡these
relations¡£
¡¡¡¡Before¡¡constructing¡¡any¡¡objective¡¡judgement£»¡¡we¡¡compare¡¡the
conceptions¡¡that¡¡are¡¡to¡¡be¡¡placed¡¡in¡¡the¡¡judgement£»¡¡and¡¡observe
whether¡¡there¡¡exists¡¡identity¡¡£¨of¡¡many¡¡representations¡¡in¡¡one
conception£©£»¡¡if¡¡a¡¡general¡¡judgement¡¡is¡¡to¡¡be¡¡constructed£»¡¡or
difference£»¡¡if¡¡a¡¡particular£»¡¡whether¡¡there¡¡is¡¡agreement¡¡when
affirmative£»¡¡and¡¡opposition¡¡when¡¡negative¡¡judgements¡¡are¡¡to¡¡be
constructed£»¡¡and¡¡so¡¡on
СÌáʾ£º°´ »Ø³µ [Enter] ¼ü ·µ»ØÊéÄ¿£¬°´ ¡û ¼ü ·µ»ØÉÏÒ»Ò³£¬ °´ ¡ú ¼ü ½øÈëÏÂÒ»Ò³¡£
ÔÞÒ»ÏÂ
Ìí¼ÓÊéÇ©¼ÓÈëÊé¼Ü