profundity¡£
¡¡¡¡Transcendental¡¡topic£»¡¡on¡¡the¡¡contrary£»¡¡contains¡¡nothing¡¡more¡¡than
the¡¡above¡mentioned¡¡four¡¡titles¡¡of¡¡all¡¡comparison¡¡and¡¡distinction£»
which¡¡differ¡¡from¡¡categories¡¡in¡¡this¡¡respect£»¡¡that¡¡they¡¡do¡¡not
represent¡¡the¡¡object¡¡according¡¡to¡¡that¡¡which¡¡constitutes¡¡its
conception¡¡£¨quantity£»¡¡reality£©£»¡¡but¡¡set¡¡forth¡¡merely¡¡the¡¡comparison¡¡of
representations£»¡¡which¡¡precedes¡¡our¡¡conceptions¡¡of¡¡things¡£¡¡But¡¡this
comparison¡¡requires¡¡a¡¡previous¡¡reflection£»¡¡that¡¡is£»¡¡a¡¡determination¡¡of
the¡¡place¡¡to¡¡which¡¡the¡¡representations¡¡of¡¡the¡¡things¡¡which¡¡are
compared¡¡belong£»¡¡whether£»¡¡to¡¡wit£»¡¡they¡¡are¡¡cogitated¡¡by¡¡the¡¡pure
understanding£»¡¡or¡¡given¡¡by¡¡sensibility¡£
¡¡¡¡Conceptions¡¡may¡¡be¡¡logically¡¡compared¡¡without¡¡the¡¡trouble¡¡of
inquiring¡¡to¡¡what¡¡faculty¡¡their¡¡objects¡¡belong£»¡¡whether¡¡as¡¡noumena£»¡¡to
the¡¡understanding£»¡¡or¡¡as¡¡phenomena£»¡¡to¡¡sensibility¡£¡¡If£»¡¡however£»¡¡we
wish¡¡to¡¡employ¡¡these¡¡conceptions¡¡in¡¡respect¡¡of¡¡objects£»¡¡previous
transcendental¡¡reflection¡¡is¡¡necessary¡£¡¡Without¡¡this¡¡reflection¡¡I
should¡¡make¡¡a¡¡very¡¡unsafe¡¡use¡¡of¡¡these¡¡conceptions£»¡¡and¡¡construct
pretended¡¡synthetical¡¡propositions¡¡which¡¡critical¡¡reason¡¡cannot
acknowledge¡¡and¡¡which¡¡are¡¡based¡¡solely¡¡upon¡¡a¡¡transcendental
amphiboly£»¡¡that¡¡is£»¡¡upon¡¡a¡¡substitution¡¡of¡¡an¡¡object¡¡of¡¡pure
understanding¡¡for¡¡a¡¡phenomenon¡£
¡¡¡¡For¡¡want¡¡of¡¡this¡¡doctrine¡¡of¡¡transcendental¡¡topic£»¡¡and
consequently¡¡deceived¡¡by¡¡the¡¡amphiboly¡¡of¡¡the¡¡conceptions¡¡of
reflection£»¡¡the¡¡celebrated¡¡Leibnitz¡¡constructed¡¡an¡¡intellectual¡¡system
of¡¡the¡¡world£»¡¡or¡¡rather£»¡¡believed¡¡himself¡¡competent¡¡to¡¡cognize¡¡the
internal¡¡nature¡¡of¡¡things£»¡¡by¡¡comparing¡¡all¡¡objects¡¡merely¡¡with¡¡the
understanding¡¡and¡¡the¡¡abstract¡¡formal¡¡conceptions¡¡of¡¡thought¡£¡¡Our
table¡¡of¡¡the¡¡conceptions¡¡of¡¡reflection¡¡gives¡¡us¡¡the¡¡unexpected
advantage¡¡of¡¡being¡¡able¡¡to¡¡exhibit¡¡the¡¡distinctive¡¡peculiarities¡¡of
his¡¡system¡¡in¡¡all¡¡its¡¡parts£»¡¡and¡¡at¡¡the¡¡same¡¡time¡¡of¡¡exposing¡¡the
fundamental¡¡principle¡¡of¡¡this¡¡peculiar¡¡mode¡¡of¡¡thought£»¡¡which¡¡rested
upon¡¡naught¡¡but¡¡a¡¡misconception¡£¡¡He¡¡compared¡¡all¡¡things¡¡with¡¡each
other¡¡merely¡¡by¡¡means¡¡of¡¡conceptions£»¡¡and¡¡naturally¡¡found¡¡no¡¡other
differences¡¡than¡¡those¡¡by¡¡which¡¡the¡¡understanding¡¡distinguishes¡¡its
pure¡¡conceptions¡¡one¡¡from¡¡another¡£¡¡The¡¡conditions¡¡of¡¡sensuous
intuition£»¡¡which¡¡contain¡¡in¡¡themselves¡¡their¡¡own¡¡means¡¡of¡¡distinction£»
he¡¡did¡¡not¡¡look¡¡upon¡¡as¡¡primitive£»¡¡because¡¡sensibility¡¡was¡¡to¡¡him
but¡¡a¡¡confused¡¡mode¡¡of¡¡representation¡¡and¡¡not¡¡any¡¡particular¡¡source¡¡of
representations¡£¡¡A¡¡phenomenon¡¡was¡¡for¡¡him¡¡the¡¡representation¡¡of¡¡the
thing¡¡in¡¡itself£»¡¡although¡¡distinguished¡¡from¡¡cognition¡¡by¡¡the
understanding¡¡only¡¡in¡¡respect¡¡of¡¡the¡¡logical¡¡form¡¡¡the¡¡former¡¡with¡¡its
usual¡¡want¡¡of¡¡analysis¡¡containing£»¡¡according¡¡to¡¡him£»¡¡a¡¡certain¡¡mixture
of¡¡collateral¡¡representations¡¡in¡¡its¡¡conception¡¡of¡¡a¡¡thing£»¡¡which¡¡it
is¡¡the¡¡duty¡¡of¡¡the¡¡understanding¡¡to¡¡separate¡¡and¡¡distinguish¡£¡¡In¡¡one
word£»¡¡Leibnitz¡¡intellectualized¡¡phenomena£»¡¡just¡¡as¡¡Locke£»¡¡in¡¡his
system¡¡of¡¡noogony¡¡£¨if¡¡I¡¡may¡¡be¡¡allowed¡¡to¡¡make¡¡use¡¡of¡¡such
expressions£©£»¡¡sensualized¡¡the¡¡conceptions¡¡of¡¡the¡¡understanding£»¡¡that
is¡¡to¡¡say£»¡¡declared¡¡them¡¡to¡¡be¡¡nothing¡¡more¡¡than¡¡empirical¡¡or¡¡abstract
conceptions¡¡of¡¡reflection¡£¡¡Instead¡¡of¡¡seeking¡¡in¡¡the¡¡understanding¡¡and
sensibility¡¡two¡¡different¡¡sources¡¡of¡¡representations£»¡¡which£»
however£»¡¡can¡¡present¡¡us¡¡with¡¡objective¡¡judgements¡¡of¡¡things¡¡only¡¡in
conjunction£»¡¡each¡¡of¡¡these¡¡great¡¡men¡¡recognized¡¡but¡¡one¡¡of¡¡these
faculties£»¡¡which£»¡¡in¡¡their¡¡opinion£»¡¡applied¡¡immediately¡¡to¡¡things¡¡in
themselves£»¡¡the¡¡other¡¡having¡¡no¡¡duty¡¡but¡¡that¡¡of¡¡confusing¡¡or
arranging¡¡the¡¡representations¡¡of¡¡the¡¡former¡£
¡¡¡¡Accordingly£»¡¡the¡¡objects¡¡of¡¡sense¡¡were¡¡compared¡¡by¡¡Leibnitz¡¡as
things¡¡in¡¡general¡¡merely¡¡in¡¡the¡¡understanding¡£
¡¡¡¡1st¡£¡¡He¡¡compares¡¡them¡¡in¡¡regard¡¡to¡¡their¡¡identity¡¡or¡¡difference¡
as¡¡judged¡¡by¡¡the¡¡understanding¡£¡¡As£»¡¡therefore£»¡¡he¡¡considered¡¡merely
the¡¡conceptions¡¡of¡¡objects£»¡¡and¡¡not¡¡their¡¡position¡¡in¡¡intuition£»¡¡in
which¡¡alone¡¡objects¡¡can¡¡be¡¡given£»¡¡and¡¡left¡¡quite¡¡out¡¡of¡¡sight¡¡the
transcendental¡¡locale¡¡of¡¡these¡¡conceptions¡¡¡whether£»¡¡that¡¡is£»¡¡their
object¡¡ought¡¡to¡¡be¡¡classed¡¡among¡¡phenomena£»¡¡or¡¡among¡¡things¡¡in
themselves£»¡¡it¡¡was¡¡to¡¡be¡¡expected¡¡that¡¡he¡¡should¡¡extend¡¡the
application¡¡of¡¡the¡¡principle¡¡of¡¡indiscernibles£»¡¡which¡¡is¡¡valid
solely¡¡of¡¡conceptions¡¡of¡¡things¡¡in¡¡general£»¡¡to¡¡objects¡¡of¡¡sense
£¨mundus¡¡phaenomenon£©£»¡¡and¡¡that¡¡he¡¡should¡¡believe¡¡that¡¡he¡¡had¡¡thereby
contributed¡¡in¡¡no¡¡small¡¡degree¡¡to¡¡extend¡¡our¡¡knowledge¡¡of¡¡nature¡£¡¡In
truth£»¡¡if¡¡I¡¡cognize¡¡in¡¡all¡¡its¡¡inner¡¡determinations¡¡a¡¡drop¡¡of¡¡water¡¡as
a¡¡thing¡¡in¡¡itself£»¡¡I¡¡cannot¡¡look¡¡upon¡¡one¡¡drop¡¡as¡¡different¡¡from
another£»¡¡if¡¡the¡¡conception¡¡of¡¡the¡¡one¡¡is¡¡completely¡¡identical¡¡with
that¡¡of¡¡the¡¡other¡£¡¡But¡¡if¡¡it¡¡is¡¡a¡¡phenomenon¡¡in¡¡space£»¡¡it¡¡has¡¡a
place¡¡not¡¡merely¡¡in¡¡the¡¡understanding¡¡£¨among¡¡conceptions£©£»¡¡but¡¡also¡¡in
sensuous¡¡external¡¡intuition¡¡£¨in¡¡space£©£»¡¡and¡¡in¡¡this¡¡case£»¡¡the¡¡physical
locale¡¡is¡¡a¡¡matter¡¡of¡¡indifference¡¡in¡¡regard¡¡to¡¡the¡¡internal
determinations¡¡of¡¡things£»¡¡and¡¡one¡¡place£»¡¡B£»¡¡may¡¡contain¡¡a¡¡thing
which¡¡is¡¡perfectly¡¡similar¡¡and¡¡equal¡¡to¡¡another¡¡in¡¡a¡¡place£»¡¡A£»¡¡just¡¡as
well¡¡as¡¡if¡¡the¡¡two¡¡things¡¡were¡¡in¡¡every¡¡respect¡¡different¡¡from¡¡each
other¡£¡¡Difference¡¡of¡¡place¡¡without¡¡any¡¡other¡¡conditions£»¡¡makes¡¡the
plurality¡¡and¡¡distinction¡¡of¡¡objects¡¡as¡¡phenomena£»¡¡not¡¡only¡¡possible
in¡¡itself£»¡¡but¡¡even¡¡necessary¡£¡¡Consequently£»¡¡the¡¡above¡¡so¡called¡¡law
is¡¡not¡¡a¡¡law¡¡of¡¡nature¡£¡¡It¡¡is¡¡merely¡¡an¡¡analytical¡¡rule¡¡for¡¡the
comparison¡¡of¡¡things¡¡by¡¡means¡¡of¡¡mere¡¡conceptions¡£
¡¡¡¡2nd¡£¡¡The¡¡principle£º¡¡¡¨Realities¡¡£¨as¡¡simple¡¡affirmations£©¡¡never
logically¡¡contradict¡¡each¡¡other£»¡¨¡¡is¡¡a¡¡proposition¡¡perfectly¡¡true
respecting¡¡the¡¡relation¡¡of¡¡conceptions£»¡¡but£»¡¡whether¡¡as¡¡regards
nature£»¡¡or¡¡things¡¡in¡¡themselves¡¡£¨of¡¡which¡¡we¡¡have¡¡not¡¡the¡¡slightest
conception£©£»¡¡is¡¡without¡¡any¡¡the¡¡least¡¡meaning¡£¡¡For¡¡real¡¡opposition£»¡¡in
which¡¡A¡¡¡¡¡B¡¡is¡¡=¡¡0£»¡¡exists¡¡everywhere£»¡¡an¡¡opposition£»¡¡that¡¡is£»¡¡in
which¡¡one¡¡reality¡¡united¡¡with¡¡another¡¡in¡¡the¡¡same¡¡subject
annihilates¡¡the¡¡effects¡¡of¡¡the¡¡other¡¡¡a¡¡fact¡¡which¡¡is¡¡constantly
brought¡¡before¡¡our¡¡eyes¡¡by¡¡the¡¡different¡¡antagonistic¡¡actions¡¡and
operations¡¡in¡¡nature£»¡¡which£»¡¡nevertheless£»¡¡as¡¡depending¡¡on¡¡real
forces£»¡¡must¡¡be¡¡called¡¡realitates¡¡phaenomena¡£¡¡General¡¡mechanics¡¡can
even¡¡present¡¡us¡¡with¡¡the¡¡empirical¡¡condition¡¡of¡¡this¡¡opposition¡¡in
an¡¡a¡¡priori¡¡rule£»¡¡as¡¡it¡¡directs¡¡its¡¡attention¡¡to¡¡the¡¡opposition¡¡in¡¡the
direction¡¡of¡¡forces¡¡¡a¡¡condition¡¡of¡¡which¡¡the¡¡transcendental
conception¡¡of¡¡reality¡¡can¡¡tell¡¡us¡¡nothing¡£¡¡Although¡¡M¡£¡¡Leibnitz¡¡did
not¡¡announce¡¡this¡¡proposition¡¡with¡¡precisely¡¡the¡¡pomp¡¡of¡¡a¡¡new
principle£»¡¡he¡¡yet¡¡employed¡¡it¡¡for¡¡the¡¡establishment¡¡of¡¡new
propositions£»¡¡and¡¡his¡¡followers¡¡introduced¡¡it¡¡into¡¡their
Leibnitzio¡Wolfian¡¡system¡¡of¡¡philosophy¡£¡¡According¡¡to¡¡this
principle£»¡¡for¡¡example£»¡¡all¡¡evils¡¡are¡¡but¡¡consequences¡¡of¡¡the
limited¡¡nature¡¡of¡¡created¡¡beings£»¡¡that¡¡is£»¡¡negations£»¡¡because¡¡these
are¡¡the¡¡only¡¡opposite¡¡of¡¡reality¡£¡¡£¨In¡¡the¡¡mere¡¡conception¡¡of¡¡a¡¡thing
in¡¡general¡¡this¡¡is¡¡really¡¡the¡¡case£»¡¡but¡¡not¡¡in¡¡things¡¡as¡¡phenomena¡££©
In¡¡like¡¡manner£»¡¡the¡¡upholders¡¡of¡¡this¡¡system¡¡deem¡¡it¡¡not¡¡only
possible£»¡¡but¡¡natural¡¡also£»¡¡to¡¡connect¡¡and¡¡unite¡¡all¡¡reality¡¡in¡¡one
being£»¡¡because¡¡they¡¡acknowledge¡¡no¡¡other¡¡sort¡¡of¡¡opposition¡¡than
that¡¡of¡¡contradiction¡¡£¨by¡¡which¡¡the¡¡conception¡¡itself¡¡of¡¡a¡¡thing¡¡is
annihilated£©£»¡¡and¡¡find¡¡themselves¡¡unable¡¡to¡¡conceive¡¡an¡¡opposition
of¡¡reciprocal¡¡destruction£»¡¡so¡¡to¡¡speak£»¡¡in¡¡which¡¡one¡¡real¡¡cause
destroys¡¡the¡¡effect¡¡of¡¡another£»¡¡and¡¡the¡¡conditions¡¡of¡¡whose
representation¡¡we¡¡meet¡¡with¡¡only¡¡in¡¡sensibility¡£
¡¡¡¡3rd¡£¡¡The¡¡Leibnitzian¡¡monadology¡¡has¡¡really¡¡no¡¡better¡¡foundation¡¡than
on¡¡this¡¡philosopher's¡¡mode¡¡of¡¡falsely¡¡representing¡¡the¡¡difference¡¡of
the¡¡internal¡¡and¡¡external¡¡solely¡¡in¡¡relation¡¡to¡¡the¡¡understanding¡£
Substances£»¡¡in¡¡general£»¡¡must¡¡have¡¡something¡¡inward£»¡¡which¡¡is¡¡therefore
free¡¡from¡¡external¡¡relations£»¡¡consequently¡¡from¡¡that¡¡of¡¡composition
also¡£¡¡The¡¡simple¡¡¡that¡¡which¡¡can¡¡be¡¡represented¡¡by¡¡a¡¡unit¡¡¡is
therefore¡¡the¡¡foundation¡¡of¡¡that¡¡which¡¡is¡¡internal¡¡in¡¡things¡¡in
themselves¡£¡¡The¡¡internal¡¡state¡¡of¡¡substances¡¡cannot¡¡therefore
consist¡¡in¡¡place£»¡¡shape£»¡¡contact£»¡¡or¡¡motion£»¡¡determinations¡¡which
are¡¡all¡¡external¡¡relations£»¡¡and¡¡we¡¡can¡¡ascribe¡¡to¡¡them¡¡no¡¡other¡¡than
that¡¡whereby¡¡we¡¡internally¡¡determine¡¡our¡¡faculty¡¡of¡¡sense¡¡itself£»¡¡that
is¡¡to¡¡say£»¡¡the¡¡state¡¡of¡¡representation¡£¡¡Thus£»¡¡then£»¡¡were¡¡constructed
the¡¡monads£»¡¡which¡¡were¡¡to¡¡form¡¡the¡¡elements¡¡of¡¡the¡¡universe£»¡¡the
active¡¡force¡¡of¡¡which¡¡consists¡¡in¡¡representation£»¡¡the¡¡effects¡¡of
this¡¡force¡¡being¡¡thus¡¡entirely¡¡confined¡¡to¡¡themselves¡£
¡¡¡¡For¡¡the¡¡same¡¡reason£»¡¡his¡¡view¡¡of¡¡the¡¡possible¡¡community¡¡of
substances¡¡could¡¡not¡¡represent¡¡it¡¡but¡¡as¡¡a¡¡predetermined¡¡harmony£»
and¡¡by¡¡no¡¡means¡¡as¡¡a¡¡physical¡¡influence¡£¡¡For¡¡inasmuch¡¡as¡¡everything¡¡is
occupied¡¡only¡¡internally£»¡¡that¡¡is£»¡¡with¡¡its¡¡own¡¡representations£»¡¡the
state¡¡of¡¡the¡¡representations¡¡of¡¡one¡¡substance¡¡could¡¡not¡¡stand¡¡in
active¡¡and¡¡living¡¡connection¡¡with¡¡that¡¡of¡¡another£»¡¡but¡¡some¡¡third
cause¡¡operating¡¡on¡¡all¡¡without¡¡exception¡¡was¡¡necessary¡¡to¡¡make¡¡the
different¡¡states¡¡correspond¡¡with¡¡one¡¡another¡£¡¡And¡¡this¡¡did¡¡not
happen¡¡by¡¡means¡¡of¡¡assistance¡¡applied¡¡in¡¡each¡¡particular¡¡case¡¡£¨systema
assistentiae£©£»¡¡but¡¡through¡¡the¡¡unity¡¡of¡¡the¡¡idea¡¡of¡¡a¡¡cause¡¡occupied
and¡¡connected¡¡with¡¡all¡¡substances£»¡¡in¡¡which¡¡they¡¡necessarily
receive£»¡¡according¡¡to¡¡the¡¡Leibnitzian¡¡school£»¡¡their¡¡existence¡¡and
permanence£»¡¡consequently¡¡also¡¡reciprocal¡¡correspondence£»¡¡according
to¡¡universal¡¡laws¡£
¡¡¡¡4th¡£¡¡This¡¡philosopher's¡¡celebrated¡¡doctrine¡¡of¡¡space¡¡and¡¡time£»¡¡in
which¡¡he¡¡intellectualized¡¡these¡¡forms¡¡of¡¡sensibility£»¡¡originated¡¡in
the¡¡same¡¡delusion¡¡of¡¡transcendental¡¡reflection¡£¡¡If¡¡I¡¡attempt¡¡to
represent¡¡by¡¡the¡¡mere¡¡understanding£»¡¡the¡¡external¡¡relations¡¡of¡¡things£»
I¡¡can¡¡do¡¡so¡¡only¡¡by¡¡employing¡¡the¡¡conception¡¡of¡¡their¡¡reciprocal
action£»¡¡and¡¡if¡¡I¡¡wish¡¡to¡¡connect¡¡one¡¡state¡¡of¡¡the¡¡same¡¡thing¡¡with
another¡¡state£»¡¡I¡¡must¡¡avail¡¡myself¡¡of¡¡the¡¡notion¡¡of¡¡the¡¡order¡¡of¡¡cause
and¡¡effect¡£¡¡And¡¡thus¡¡Leibnitz¡¡regarded¡¡space¡¡as¡¡a¡¡certain¡¡order¡¡in¡¡the
community¡¡of¡¡substances£»¡¡and¡¡time¡¡as¡¡the¡¡dynamical¡¡sequence¡¡of¡¡their
states¡£¡¡That¡¡which¡¡space¡¡and¡¡time¡¡possess¡¡proper¡¡to¡¡themselv
СÌáʾ£º°´ »Ø³µ [Enter] ¼ü ·µ»ØÊéÄ¿£¬°´ ¡û ¼ü ·µ»ØÉÏÒ»Ò³£¬ °´ ¡ú ¼ü ½øÈëÏÂÒ»Ò³¡£
ÔÞÒ»ÏÂ
Ìí¼ÓÊéÇ©¼ÓÈëÊé¼Ü