contained¡¡in¡¡the¡¡main¡¡proposition¡¡£¨for¡¡the¡¡conception¡¡of¡¡a¡¡learned¡¡man
does¡¡not¡¡occur¡¡in¡¡it£©£»¡¡and¡¡it¡¡can¡¡be¡¡deduced¡¡from¡¡the¡¡main¡¡proposition
only¡¡by¡¡means¡¡of¡¡a¡¡mediating¡¡judgement¡£
¡¡¡¡In¡¡every¡¡syllogism¡¡I¡¡first¡¡cogitate¡¡a¡¡rule¡¡£¨the¡¡major£©¡¡by¡¡means¡¡of
the¡¡understanding¡£¡¡In¡¡the¡¡next¡¡place¡¡I¡¡subsume¡¡a¡¡cognition¡¡under¡¡the
condition¡¡of¡¡the¡¡rule¡¡£¨and¡¡this¡¡is¡¡the¡¡minor£©¡¡by¡¡means¡¡of¡¡the
judgement¡£¡¡And¡¡finally¡¡I¡¡determine¡¡my¡¡cognition¡¡by¡¡means¡¡of¡¡the
predicate¡¡of¡¡the¡¡rule¡¡£¨this¡¡is¡¡the¡¡conclusio£©£»¡¡consequently£»¡¡I
determine¡¡it¡¡a¡¡priori¡¡by¡¡means¡¡of¡¡the¡¡reason¡£¡¡The¡¡relations£»
therefore£»¡¡which¡¡the¡¡major¡¡proposition£»¡¡as¡¡the¡¡rule£»¡¡represents
between¡¡a¡¡cognition¡¡and¡¡its¡¡condition£»¡¡constitute¡¡the¡¡different
kinds¡¡of¡¡syllogisms¡£¡¡These¡¡are¡¡just¡¡threefold¡¡¡analogously¡¡with¡¡all
judgements£»¡¡in¡¡so¡¡far¡¡as¡¡they¡¡differ¡¡in¡¡the¡¡mode¡¡of¡¡expressing¡¡the
relation¡¡of¡¡a¡¡cognition¡¡in¡¡the¡¡understanding¡¡¡namely£»¡¡categorical£»
hypothetical£»¡¡and¡¡disjunctive¡£
¡¡¡¡When¡¡as¡¡often¡¡happens£»¡¡the¡¡conclusion¡¡is¡¡a¡¡judgement¡¡which¡¡may
follow¡¡from¡¡other¡¡given¡¡judgements£»¡¡through¡¡which¡¡a¡¡perfectly
different¡¡object¡¡is¡¡cogitated£»¡¡I¡¡endeavour¡¡to¡¡discover¡¡in¡¡the
understanding¡¡whether¡¡the¡¡assertion¡¡in¡¡this¡¡conclusion¡¡does¡¡not
stand¡¡under¡¡certain¡¡conditions¡¡according¡¡to¡¡a¡¡general¡¡rule¡£¡¡If¡¡I
find¡¡such¡¡a¡¡condition£»¡¡and¡¡if¡¡the¡¡object¡¡mentioned¡¡in¡¡the¡¡conclusion
can¡¡be¡¡subsumed¡¡under¡¡the¡¡given¡¡condition£»¡¡then¡¡this¡¡conclusion
follows¡¡from¡¡a¡¡rule¡¡which¡¡is¡¡also¡¡valid¡¡for¡¡other¡¡objects¡¡of
cognition¡£¡¡From¡¡this¡¡we¡¡see¡¡that¡¡reason¡¡endeavours¡¡to¡¡subject¡¡the
great¡¡variety¡¡of¡¡the¡¡cognitions¡¡of¡¡the¡¡understanding¡¡to¡¡the¡¡smallest
possible¡¡number¡¡of¡¡principles¡¡£¨general¡¡conditions£©£»¡¡and¡¡thus¡¡to
produce¡¡in¡¡it¡¡the¡¡highest¡¡unity¡£
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡C¡£¡¡OF¡¡THE¡¡PURE¡¡USE¡¡OF¡¡REASON¡£
¡¡¡¡Can¡¡we¡¡isolate¡¡reason£»¡¡and£»¡¡if¡¡so£»¡¡is¡¡it¡¡in¡¡this¡¡case¡¡a¡¡peculiar
source¡¡of¡¡conceptions¡¡and¡¡judgements¡¡which¡¡spring¡¡from¡¡it¡¡alone£»¡¡and
through¡¡which¡¡it¡¡can¡¡be¡¡applied¡¡to¡¡objects£»¡¡or¡¡is¡¡it¡¡merely¡¡a
subordinate¡¡faculty£»¡¡whose¡¡duty¡¡it¡¡is¡¡to¡¡give¡¡a¡¡certain¡¡form¡¡to
given¡¡cognitions¡¡¡a¡¡form¡¡which¡¡is¡¡called¡¡logical£»¡¡and¡¡through¡¡which
the¡¡cognitions¡¡of¡¡the¡¡understanding¡¡are¡¡subordinated¡¡to¡¡each¡¡other£»
and¡¡lower¡¡rules¡¡to¡¡higher¡¡£¨those£»¡¡to¡¡wit£»¡¡whose¡¡condition¡¡comprises¡¡in
its¡¡sphere¡¡the¡¡condition¡¡of¡¡the¡¡others£©£»¡¡in¡¡so¡¡far¡¡as¡¡this¡¡can¡¡be¡¡done
by¡¡comparison£¿¡¡This¡¡is¡¡the¡¡question¡¡which¡¡we¡¡have¡¡at¡¡present¡¡to
answer¡£¡¡Manifold¡¡variety¡¡of¡¡rules¡¡and¡¡unity¡¡of¡¡principles¡¡is¡¡a
requirement¡¡of¡¡reason£»¡¡for¡¡the¡¡purpose¡¡of¡¡bringing¡¡the¡¡understanding
into¡¡complete¡¡accordance¡¡with¡¡itself£»¡¡just¡¡as¡¡understanding¡¡subjects
the¡¡manifold¡¡content¡¡of¡¡intuition¡¡to¡¡conceptions£»¡¡and¡¡thereby
introduces¡¡connection¡¡into¡¡it¡£¡¡But¡¡this¡¡principle¡¡prescribes¡¡no¡¡law¡¡to
objects£»¡¡and¡¡does¡¡not¡¡contain¡¡any¡¡ground¡¡of¡¡the¡¡possibility¡¡of
cognizing¡¡or¡¡of¡¡determining¡¡them¡¡as¡¡such£»¡¡but¡¡is¡¡merely¡¡a¡¡subjective
law¡¡for¡¡the¡¡proper¡¡arrangement¡¡of¡¡the¡¡content¡¡of¡¡the¡¡understanding¡£
The¡¡purpose¡¡of¡¡this¡¡law¡¡is£»¡¡by¡¡a¡¡comparison¡¡of¡¡the¡¡conceptions¡¡of
the¡¡understanding£»¡¡to¡¡reduce¡¡them¡¡to¡¡the¡¡smallest¡¡possible¡¡number£»
although£»¡¡at¡¡the¡¡same¡¡time£»¡¡it¡¡does¡¡not¡¡justify¡¡us¡¡in¡¡demanding¡¡from
objects¡¡themselves¡¡such¡¡a¡¡uniformity¡¡as¡¡might¡¡contribute¡¡to¡¡the
convenience¡¡and¡¡the¡¡enlargement¡¡of¡¡the¡¡sphere¡¡of¡¡the¡¡understanding£»¡¡or
in¡¡expecting¡¡that¡¡it¡¡will¡¡itself¡¡thus¡¡receive¡¡from¡¡them¡¡objective
validity¡£¡¡In¡¡one¡¡word£»¡¡the¡¡question¡¡is£º¡¡¡¨does¡¡reason¡¡in¡¡itself£»¡¡that
is£»¡¡does¡¡pure¡¡reason¡¡contain¡¡a¡¡priori¡¡synthetical¡¡principles¡¡and
rules£»¡¡and¡¡what¡¡are¡¡those¡¡principles£¿¡¨
¡¡¡¡The¡¡formal¡¡and¡¡logical¡¡procedure¡¡of¡¡reason¡¡in¡¡syllogisms¡¡gives¡¡us
sufficient¡¡information¡¡in¡¡regard¡¡to¡¡the¡¡ground¡¡on¡¡which¡¡the
transcendental¡¡principle¡¡of¡¡reason¡¡in¡¡its¡¡pure¡¡synthetical¡¡cognition
will¡¡rest¡£
¡¡¡¡1¡£¡¡Reason£»¡¡as¡¡observed¡¡in¡¡the¡¡syllogistic¡¡process£»¡¡is¡¡not¡¡applicable
to¡¡intuitions£»¡¡for¡¡the¡¡purpose¡¡of¡¡subjecting¡¡them¡¡to¡¡rules¡¡¡for¡¡this
is¡¡the¡¡province¡¡of¡¡the¡¡understanding¡¡with¡¡its¡¡categories¡¡¡but¡¡to
conceptions¡¡and¡¡judgements¡£¡¡If¡¡pure¡¡reason¡¡does¡¡apply¡¡to¡¡objects¡¡and
the¡¡intuition¡¡of¡¡them£»¡¡it¡¡does¡¡so¡¡not¡¡immediately£»¡¡but¡¡mediately¡
through¡¡the¡¡understanding¡¡and¡¡its¡¡judgements£»¡¡which¡¡have¡¡a¡¡direct
relation¡¡to¡¡the¡¡senses¡¡and¡¡their¡¡intuition£»¡¡for¡¡the¡¡purpose¡¡of
determining¡¡their¡¡objects¡£¡¡The¡¡unity¡¡of¡¡reason¡¡is¡¡therefore¡¡not¡¡the
unity¡¡of¡¡a¡¡possible¡¡experience£»¡¡but¡¡is¡¡essentially¡¡different¡¡from¡¡this
unity£»¡¡which¡¡is¡¡that¡¡of¡¡the¡¡understanding¡£¡¡That¡¡everything¡¡which
happens¡¡has¡¡a¡¡cause£»¡¡is¡¡not¡¡a¡¡principle¡¡cognized¡¡and¡¡prescribed¡¡by
reason¡£¡¡This¡¡principle¡¡makes¡¡the¡¡unity¡¡of¡¡experience¡¡possible¡¡and
borrows¡¡nothing¡¡from¡¡reason£»¡¡which£»¡¡without¡¡a¡¡reference¡¡to¡¡possible
experience£»¡¡could¡¡never¡¡have¡¡produced¡¡by¡¡means¡¡of¡¡mere¡¡conceptions¡¡any
such¡¡synthetical¡¡unity¡£
¡¡¡¡2¡£¡¡Reason£»¡¡in¡¡its¡¡logical¡¡use£»¡¡endeavours¡¡to¡¡discover¡¡the¡¡general
condition¡¡of¡¡its¡¡judgement¡¡£¨the¡¡conclusion£©£»¡¡and¡¡a¡¡syllogism¡¡is¡¡itself
nothing¡¡but¡¡a¡¡judgement¡¡by¡¡means¡¡of¡¡the¡¡subsumption¡¡of¡¡its¡¡condition
under¡¡a¡¡general¡¡rule¡¡£¨the¡¡major£©¡£¡¡Now¡¡as¡¡this¡¡rule¡¡may¡¡itself¡¡be
subjected¡¡to¡¡the¡¡same¡¡process¡¡of¡¡reason£»¡¡and¡¡thus¡¡the¡¡condition¡¡of¡¡the
condition¡¡be¡¡sought¡¡£¨by¡¡means¡¡of¡¡a¡¡prosyllogism£©¡¡as¡¡long¡¡as¡¡the
process¡¡can¡¡be¡¡continued£»¡¡it¡¡is¡¡very¡¡manifest¡¡that¡¡the¡¡peculiar
principle¡¡of¡¡reason¡¡in¡¡its¡¡logical¡¡use¡¡is¡¡to¡¡find¡¡for¡¡the
conditioned¡¡cognition¡¡of¡¡the¡¡understanding¡¡the¡¡unconditioned¡¡whereby
the¡¡unity¡¡of¡¡the¡¡former¡¡is¡¡completed¡£
¡¡¡¡But¡¡this¡¡logical¡¡maxim¡¡cannot¡¡be¡¡a¡¡principle¡¡of¡¡pure¡¡reason£»
unless¡¡we¡¡admit¡¡that£»¡¡if¡¡the¡¡conditioned¡¡is¡¡given£»¡¡the¡¡whole¡¡series¡¡of
conditions¡¡subordinated¡¡to¡¡one¡¡another¡¡¡a¡¡series¡¡which¡¡is¡¡consequently
itself¡¡unconditioned¡¡¡is¡¡also¡¡given£»¡¡that¡¡is£»¡¡contained¡¡in¡¡the
object¡¡and¡¡its¡¡connection¡£
¡¡¡¡But¡¡this¡¡principle¡¡of¡¡pure¡¡reason¡¡is¡¡evidently¡¡synthetical£»¡¡for£»
analytically£»¡¡the¡¡conditioned¡¡certainly¡¡relates¡¡to¡¡some¡¡condition£»¡¡but
not¡¡to¡¡the¡¡unconditioned¡£¡¡From¡¡this¡¡principle¡¡also¡¡there¡¡must
originate¡¡different¡¡synthetical¡¡propositions£»¡¡of¡¡which¡¡the¡¡pure
understanding¡¡is¡¡perfectly¡¡ignorant£»¡¡for¡¡it¡¡has¡¡to¡¡do¡¡only¡¡with
objects¡¡of¡¡a¡¡possible¡¡experience£»¡¡the¡¡cognition¡¡and¡¡synthesis¡¡of¡¡which
is¡¡always¡¡conditioned¡£¡¡The¡¡unconditioned£»¡¡if¡¡it¡¡does¡¡really¡¡exist£»
must¡¡be¡¡especially¡¡considered¡¡in¡¡regard¡¡to¡¡the¡¡determinations¡¡which
distinguish¡¡it¡¡from¡¡whatever¡¡is¡¡conditioned£»¡¡and¡¡will¡¡thus¡¡afford¡¡us
material¡¡for¡¡many¡¡a¡¡priori¡¡synthetical¡¡propositions¡£
¡¡¡¡The¡¡principles¡¡resulting¡¡from¡¡this¡¡highest¡¡principle¡¡of¡¡pure
reason¡¡will£»¡¡however£»¡¡be¡¡transcendent¡¡in¡¡relation¡¡to¡¡phenomena£»¡¡that
is¡¡to¡¡say£»¡¡it¡¡will¡¡be¡¡impossible¡¡to¡¡make¡¡any¡¡adequate¡¡empirical¡¡use¡¡of
this¡¡principle¡£¡¡It¡¡is¡¡therefore¡¡completely¡¡different¡¡from¡¡all
principles¡¡of¡¡the¡¡understanding£»¡¡the¡¡use¡¡made¡¡of¡¡which¡¡is¡¡entirely
immanent£»¡¡their¡¡object¡¡and¡¡purpose¡¡being¡¡merely¡¡the¡¡possibility¡¡of
experience¡£¡¡Now¡¡our¡¡duty¡¡in¡¡the¡¡transcendental¡¡dialectic¡¡is¡¡as
follows¡£¡¡To¡¡discover¡¡whether¡¡the¡¡principle¡¡that¡¡the¡¡series¡¡of
conditions¡¡£¨in¡¡the¡¡synthesis¡¡of¡¡phenomena£»¡¡or¡¡of¡¡thought¡¡in¡¡general£©
extends¡¡to¡¡the¡¡unconditioned¡¡is¡¡objectively¡¡true£»¡¡or¡¡not£»¡¡what
consequences¡¡result¡¡therefrom¡¡affecting¡¡the¡¡empirical¡¡use¡¡of¡¡the
understanding£»¡¡or¡¡rather¡¡whether¡¡there¡¡exists¡¡any¡¡such¡¡objectively
valid¡¡proposition¡¡of¡¡reason£»¡¡and¡¡whether¡¡it¡¡is¡¡not£»¡¡on¡¡the¡¡contrary£»¡¡a
merely¡¡logical¡¡precept¡¡which¡¡directs¡¡us¡¡to¡¡ascend¡¡perpetually¡¡to¡¡still
higher¡¡conditions£»¡¡to¡¡approach¡¡completeness¡¡in¡¡the¡¡series¡¡of¡¡them£»¡¡and
thus¡¡to¡¡introduce¡¡into¡¡our¡¡cognition¡¡the¡¡highest¡¡possible¡¡unity¡¡of
reason¡£¡¡We¡¡must¡¡ascertain£»¡¡I¡¡say£»¡¡whether¡¡this¡¡requirement¡¡of¡¡reason
has¡¡not¡¡been¡¡regarded£»¡¡by¡¡a¡¡misunderstanding£»¡¡as¡¡a¡¡transcendental
principle¡¡of¡¡pure¡¡reason£»¡¡which¡¡postulates¡¡a¡¡thorough¡¡completeness
in¡¡the¡¡series¡¡of¡¡conditions¡¡in¡¡objects¡¡themselves¡£¡¡We¡¡must¡¡show£»
moreover£»¡¡the¡¡misconceptions¡¡and¡¡illusions¡¡that¡¡intrude¡¡into
syllogisms£»¡¡the¡¡major¡¡proposition¡¡of¡¡which¡¡pure¡¡reason¡¡has¡¡supplied¡¡¡a
proposition¡¡which¡¡has¡¡perhaps¡¡more¡¡of¡¡the¡¡character¡¡of¡¡a¡¡petitio
than¡¡of¡¡a¡¡postulatum¡¡¡and¡¡that¡¡proceed¡¡from¡¡experience¡¡upwards¡¡to
its¡¡conditions¡£¡¡The¡¡solution¡¡of¡¡these¡¡problems¡¡is¡¡our¡¡task¡¡in
transcendental¡¡dialectic£»¡¡which¡¡we¡¡are¡¡about¡¡to¡¡expose¡¡even¡¡at¡¡its
source£»¡¡that¡¡lies¡¡deep¡¡in¡¡human¡¡reason¡£¡¡We¡¡shall¡¡divide¡¡it¡¡into¡¡two
parts£»¡¡the¡¡first¡¡of¡¡which¡¡will¡¡treat¡¡of¡¡the¡¡transcendent¡¡conceptions
of¡¡pure¡¡reason£»¡¡the¡¡second¡¡of¡¡transcendent¡¡and¡¡dialectical¡¡syllogisms¡£
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡BOOK¡¡I¡£
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡OF¡¡THE¡¡CONCEPTIONS¡¡OF¡¡PURE¡¡REASON¡£
¡¡¡¡The¡¡conceptions¡¡of¡¡pure¡¡reason¡¡¡we¡¡do¡¡not¡¡here¡¡speak¡¡of¡¡the
possibility¡¡of¡¡them¡¡¡are¡¡not¡¡obtained¡¡by¡¡reflection£»¡¡but¡¡by
inference¡¡or¡¡conclusion¡£¡¡The¡¡conceptions¡¡of¡¡understanding¡¡are¡¡also
cogitated¡¡a¡¡priori¡¡antecedently¡¡to¡¡experience£»¡¡and¡¡render¡¡it¡¡possible£»
but¡¡they¡¡contain¡¡nothing¡¡but¡¡the¡¡unity¡¡of¡¡reflection¡¡upon¡¡phenomena£»
in¡¡so¡¡far¡¡as¡¡these¡¡must¡¡necessarily¡¡belong¡¡to¡¡a¡¡possible¡¡empirical
consciousness¡£¡¡Through¡¡them¡¡alone¡¡are¡¡cognition¡¡and¡¡the
determination¡¡of¡¡an¡¡object¡¡possible¡£¡¡It¡¡is¡¡from¡¡them£»¡¡accordingly£»
that¡¡we¡¡receive¡¡material¡¡for¡¡reasoning£»¡¡and¡¡antecedently¡¡to¡¡them¡¡we
possess¡¡no¡¡a¡¡priori¡¡conceptions¡¡of¡¡objects¡¡from¡¡which¡¡they¡¡might¡¡be
deduced£»¡¡On¡¡the¡¡other¡¡hand£»¡¡the¡¡sole¡¡basis¡¡of¡¡their¡¡objective
reality¡¡consists¡¡in¡¡the¡¡necessity¡¡imposed¡¡on¡¡them£»¡¡as¡¡containing¡¡the
intellectual¡¡form¡¡of¡¡all¡¡experience£»¡¡of¡¡restricting¡¡their
application¡¡and¡¡influence¡¡to¡¡the¡¡sphere¡¡of¡¡experience¡£
¡¡¡¡But¡¡the¡¡term£»¡¡conception¡¡of¡¡reason£»¡¡or¡¡rational¡¡conception£»¡¡itself
indicates¡¡that¡¡it¡¡does¡¡not¡¡confine¡¡itself¡¡within¡¡the¡¡limits¡¡of
experience£»¡¡because¡¡its¡¡object¡matter¡¡is¡¡a¡¡cognition£»¡¡of¡¡which¡¡every
empirical¡¡cognition¡¡is¡¡but¡¡a¡¡part¡¡¡nay£»¡¡the¡¡whole¡¡of¡¡possible
experience¡¡may¡¡be¡¡itself¡¡but¡¡a¡¡part¡¡of¡¡it¡¡¡a¡¡cognition¡¡to¡¡which¡¡no
actual¡¡experience¡¡ever¡¡fully¡¡attains£»¡¡although¡¡it¡¡does¡¡always
pertain¡¡to¡¡it¡£¡¡The¡¡aim¡¡of¡¡rational¡¡conceptions¡¡is¡¡the¡¡comprehension£»
as¡¡that¡¡of¡¡the¡¡conceptions¡¡of¡¡understanding¡¡is¡¡the¡¡understanding¡¡of
perceptions¡£¡¡If¡¡they¡¡contain¡¡the¡¡unconditioned£»¡¡they¡¡relate¡¡to¡¡that¡¡to
which¡¡all¡¡experience¡¡is¡¡subordinate£»¡¡but¡¡which¡¡is¡¡never¡¡itself¡¡an
object¡¡of¡¡experience¡¡¡that¡¡towards¡¡which¡¡reason¡¡tends¡¡in¡¡all¡¡its
conclusions¡¡f
СÌáʾ£º°´ »Ø³µ [Enter] ¼ü ·µ»ØÊéÄ¿£¬°´ ¡û ¼ü ·µ»ØÉÏÒ»Ò³£¬ °´ ¡ú ¼ü ½øÈëÏÂÒ»Ò³¡£
ÔÞÒ»ÏÂ
Ìí¼ÓÊéÇ©¼ÓÈëÊé¼Ü