ty calculations and manoeuvres which employ the time of an inferior officer。 In literature the principle is equally sound。 The great tactics of criticism will； in general； be best understood by those who have not had much practice in drilling syllables and particles。
I remember to have observed among the French Anas a ludicrous instance of this。 A scholar； doubtless of great learning； recommends the study of some long Latin treatise； of which I now forget the name； on the religion； manners； government； and language of the early Greeks。 〃For there；〃 says he； 〃you will learn everything of importance that is contained in the Iliad and Odyssey； without the trouble of reading two such tedious books。〃 Alas！ it had not occurred to the poor gentleman that all the knowledge to which he attached so much value was useful only as it illustrated the great poems which he despised； and would be as worthless for any other purpose as the mythology of Caffraria； or the vocabulary of Otaheite。
Of those scholars who have disdained to confine themselves to verbal criticism few have been successful。 The ancient languages have； generally； a magical influence on their faculties。 They were 〃fools called into a circle by Greek invocations。〃 The Iliad and Aeneid were to them not books but curiosities； or rather reliques。 They no more admired those works for their merits than a good Catholic venerates the house of the Virgin at Loretto for its architecture。 Whatever was classical was good。 Homer was a great poet； and so was Callimachus。 The epistles of Cicero were fine； and so were those of Phalaris。 Even with respect to questions of evidence they fell into the same error。 The authority of all narrations； written in Greek or Latin； was the same with them。 It never crossed their minds that the lapse of five hundred years； or the distance of five hundred leagues； could affect the accuracy of a narration；that Livy could be a less veracious historian than Polybius；or that Plutarch could know less about the friends of Xenophon than Xenophon himself。 Deceived by the distance of time； they seem to consider all the Classics as contemporaries； just as I have known people in England； deceived by the distance of place； take it for granted that all persons who live in India are neighbours； and ask an inhabitant of Bombay about the health of an acquaintance at Calcutta。 It is to be hoped that no barbarian deluge will ever again pass over Europe。 But should such a calamity happen； it seems not improbable that some future Rollin or Gillies will compile a history of England from Miss Porter's Scottish Chiefs； Miss Lee's Recess； and Sir Nathaniel Wraxall's Memoirs。
It is surely time that ancient literature should be examined in a different manner； without pedantical prepossessions； but with a just allowance； at the same time； for the difference of circumstances and manners。 I am far from pretending to the knowledge or ability which such a task would require。 All that I mean to offer is a collection of desultory remarks upon a most interesting portion of Greek literature。
It may be doubted whether any compositions which have ever been produced in the world are equally perfect in their kind with the great Athenian orations。 Genius is subject to the same laws which regulate the production of cotton and molasses。 The supply adjusts itself to the demand。 The quantity may be diminished by restrictions； and multiplied by bounties。 The singular excellence to which eloquence attained at Athens is to be mainly attributed to the influence which it exerted there。 In turbulent times； under a constitution purely democratic； among a people educated exactly to that point at which men are most susceptible of strong and sudden impressions； acute； but not sound reasoners； warm in their feelings； unfixed in their principles； and passionate admirers of fine composition； oratory received such encouragement as it has never since obtained。
The taste and knowledge of the Athenian people was a favourite object of the contemptuous derision of Samuel Johnson； a man who knew nothing of Greek literature beyond the common school…books； and who seems to have brought to what he had read scarcely more than the discernment of a common school…boy。 He used to assert； with that arrogant absurdity which； in spite of his great abilities and virtues； renders him； perhaps the most ridiculous character in literary history； that Demosthenes spoke to a people of brutes；to a barbarous people；that there could have been no civilisation before the invention of printing。 Johnson was a keen but a very narrow…minded observer of mankind。 He perpetually confounded their general nature with their particular circumstances。 He knew London intimately。 The sagacity of his remarks on its society is perfectly astonishing。 But Fleet Street was the world to him。 He saw that Londoners who did not read were profoundly ignorant； and he inferred that a Greek； who had few or no books； must have been as uninformed as one of Mr Thrale's draymen。
There seems to be； on the contrary； every reason to believe； that； in general intelligence； the Athenian populace far surpassed the lower orders of any community that has ever existed。 It must be considered； that to be a citizen was to be a legislator；a soldier；a judge；one upon whose voice might depend the fate of the wealthiest tributary state； of the most eminent public man。 The lowest offices； both of agriculture and of trade； were； in common； performed by slaves。 The commonwealth supplied its meanest members with the support of life； the opportunity of leisure； and the means of amusement。 Books were indeed few： but they were excellent； and they were accurately known。 It is not by turning over libraries； but by repeatedly perusing and intently contemplating a few great models； that the mind is best disciplined。 A man of letters must now read much that he soon forgets； and much from which he learns nothing worthy to be remembered。 The best works employ； in general； but a small portion of his time。 Demosthenes is said to have transcribed six times the history of Thucydides。 If he had been a young politician of the present age； he might in the same space of time have skimmed innumerable newspapers and pamphlets。 I do not condemn that desultory mode of study which the state of things； in our day； renders a matter of necessity。 But I may be allowed to doubt whether the changes on which the admirers of modern institutions delight to dwell have improved our condition so much in reality as in appearance。 Rumford； it is said； proposed to the Elector of Bavaria a scheme for feeding his soldiers at a much cheaper rate than formerly。 His plan was simply to compel them to masticate their food thoroughly。 A small quantity； thus eaten； would； according to that famous projector； afford more sustenance than a large meal hastily devoured。 I do not know how Rumford's proposition was received； but to the mind； I believe； it will be found more nutritious to digest a page than to devour a volume。
Books； however； were the least part of the education of an Athenian citizen。 Let us； for a moment； transport ourselves in thought； to that glorious city。 Let us imagine that we are entering its gates； in the time of its power and glory。 A crowd is assembled round a portico。 All are gazing with delight at the entablature； for Phidias is putting up the frieze。 We turn into another street； a rhapsodist is reciting there： men； women； children are thronging round him： the tears are running down their cheeks： their eyes are fixed： their very breath is still； for he is telling how Priam fell at the feet of Achilles； and kissed those hands；the terriblethe murderous；which had slain so many of his sons。 （kai kuse cheiras； deinas； anorophonous； ai oi poleas ktanon uias。）
We enter the public place； there is a ring of youths； all leaning forward； with sparkling eyes； and gestures of expectation。 Socrates is pitted against the famous atheist； from Ionia； and has just brought him to a contradiction in terms。 But we are interrupted。 The herald is crying〃Room for the Prytanes。〃 The general assembly is to meet。 The people are swarming in on every side。 Proclamation is made〃Who wishes to speak？〃 There is a shout； and a clapping of hands： Pericles is mounting the stand。 Then for a play of Sophocles； and away to sup with Aspasia。 I know of no modern university which has so excellent a system of education。
Knowledge thus acquired and opinions thus formed were； indeed； likely to be； in some respects； defective。 Propositions which are advanced in discourse generally result from a partial view of the question； and cannot be kept under examination long enough to be corrected。 Men of great conversational powers almost universally practise a sort of lively sophistry and exaggeration； which deceives； for the moment； both themselves and their auditors。 Thus we see doctrines； which cannot bear a close inspection； triumph perpetually in drawing…rooms； in debating societies； and even in legislative or judicial assemblies。 To the conversational education of the Athenians I am inclined to attribute the great looseness of reasoning which is remarkable in most of their scientific writings。 Even the most illogical of modern writers would stand perfectly aghast at the puerile fallacies which seem to have deluded some of the greatest men of antiquity。 Sir Thomas Lethbridge would stare at the political economy of Xenophon； and the author of 〃Soirees de Petersbourg〃 would be ashamed of some of the metaphysical arguments of Plato。 But the very circumstances which retarded the growth of science were peculiarly favourable to the cultivation of eloquence。 From the early habit of taking a share in animated discussion the intelligent student would derive that readiness of resource； that copiousness of language； and that knowledge of the temper and understanding of an audience； which are far more valuable to an orator than the greatest logical powers。
Horace has prettily compared poems to those paintings of which the effect varies as the spectator changes his stand。 The same remark applies with at least equal justice to speeches。 They must be read with the temper of those to whom they were