between¡¡a¡¡world¡¡of¡¡sense¡¡and¡¡the¡¡world¡¡of¡¡understanding£»¡¡of¡¡which
the¡¡former¡¡may¡¡be¡¡different¡¡according¡¡to¡¡the¡¡difference¡¡of¡¡the
sensuous¡¡impressions¡¡in¡¡various¡¡observers£»¡¡while¡¡the¡¡second¡¡which¡¡is
its¡¡basis¡¡always¡¡remains¡¡the¡¡same£»¡¡Even¡¡as¡¡to¡¡himself£»¡¡a¡¡man¡¡cannot
pretend¡¡to¡¡know¡¡what¡¡he¡¡is¡¡in¡¡himself¡¡from¡¡the¡¡knowledge¡¡he¡¡has¡¡by
internal¡¡sensation¡£¡¡For¡¡as¡¡he¡¡does¡¡not¡¡as¡¡it¡¡were¡¡create¡¡himself£»
and¡¡does¡¡not¡¡come¡¡by¡¡the¡¡conception¡¡of¡¡himself¡¡a¡¡priori¡¡but
empirically£»¡¡it¡¡naturally¡¡follows¡¡that¡¡he¡¡can¡¡obtain¡¡his¡¡knowledge
even¡¡of¡¡himself¡¡only¡¡by¡¡the¡¡inner¡¡sense¡¡and£»¡¡consequently£»¡¡only
through¡¡the¡¡appearances¡¡of¡¡his¡¡nature¡¡and¡¡the¡¡way¡¡in¡¡which¡¡his
consciousness¡¡is¡¡affected¡£¡¡At¡¡the¡¡same¡¡time¡¡beyond¡¡these
characteristics¡¡of¡¡his¡¡own¡¡subject£»¡¡made¡¡up¡¡of¡¡mere¡¡appearances£»¡¡he
must¡¡necessarily¡¡suppose¡¡something¡¡else¡¡as¡¡their¡¡basis£»¡¡namely£»¡¡his
ego£»¡¡whatever¡¡its¡¡characteristics¡¡in¡¡itself¡¡may¡¡be¡£¡¡Thus¡¡in¡¡respect¡¡to
mere¡¡perception¡¡and¡¡receptivity¡¡of¡¡sensations¡¡he¡¡must¡¡reckon¡¡himself
as¡¡belonging¡¡to¡¡the¡¡world¡¡of¡¡sense£»¡¡but¡¡in¡¡respect¡¡of¡¡whatever¡¡there
may¡¡be¡¡of¡¡pure¡¡activity¡¡in¡¡him¡¡£¨that¡¡which¡¡reaches¡¡consciousness
immediately¡¡and¡¡not¡¡through¡¡affecting¡¡the¡¡senses£©£»¡¡he¡¡must¡¡reckon
himself¡¡as¡¡belonging¡¡to¡¡the¡¡intellectual¡¡world£»¡¡of¡¡which£»¡¡however£»
he¡¡has¡¡no¡¡further¡¡knowledge¡£¡¡To¡¡such¡¡a¡¡conclusion¡¡the¡¡reflecting¡¡man
must¡¡come¡¡with¡¡respect¡¡to¡¡all¡¡the¡¡things¡¡which¡¡can¡¡be¡¡presented¡¡to
him£º¡¡it¡¡is¡¡probably¡¡to¡¡be¡¡met¡¡with¡¡even¡¡in¡¡persons¡¡of¡¡the¡¡commonest
understanding£»¡¡who£»¡¡as¡¡is¡¡well¡¡known£»¡¡are¡¡very¡¡much¡¡inclined¡¡to
suppose¡¡behind¡¡the¡¡objects¡¡of¡¡the¡¡senses¡¡something¡¡else¡¡invisible
and¡¡acting¡¡of¡¡itself¡£¡¡They¡¡spoil¡¡it£»¡¡however£»¡¡by¡¡presently
sensualizing¡¡this¡¡invisible¡¡again£»¡¡that¡¡is¡¡to¡¡say£»¡¡wanting¡¡to¡¡make
it¡¡an¡¡object¡¡of¡¡intuition£»¡¡so¡¡that¡¡they¡¡do¡¡not¡¡become¡¡a¡¡whit¡¡the
wiser¡£
¡¡¡¡Now¡¡man¡¡really¡¡finds¡¡in¡¡himself¡¡a¡¡faculty¡¡by¡¡which¡¡he
distinguishes¡¡himself¡¡from¡¡everything¡¡else£»¡¡even¡¡from¡¡himself¡¡as
affected¡¡by¡¡objects£»¡¡and¡¡that¡¡is¡¡reason¡£¡¡This¡¡being¡¡pure¡¡spontaneity
is¡¡even¡¡elevated¡¡above¡¡the¡¡understanding¡£¡¡For¡¡although¡¡the¡¡latter¡¡is¡¡a
spontaneity¡¡and¡¡does¡¡not£»¡¡like¡¡sense£»¡¡merely¡¡contain¡¡intuitions¡¡that
arise¡¡when¡¡we¡¡are¡¡affected¡¡by¡¡things¡¡£¨and¡¡are¡¡therefore¡¡passive£©£»
yet¡¡it¡¡cannot¡¡produce¡¡from¡¡its¡¡activity¡¡any¡¡other¡¡conceptions¡¡than
those¡¡which¡¡merely¡¡serve¡¡to¡¡bring¡¡the¡¡intuitions¡¡of¡¡sense¡¡under
rules¡¡and£»¡¡thereby£»¡¡to¡¡unite¡¡them¡¡in¡¡one¡¡consciousness£»¡¡and¡¡without
this¡¡use¡¡of¡¡the¡¡sensibility¡¡it¡¡could¡¡not¡¡think¡¡at¡¡all£»¡¡whereas£»¡¡on¡¡the
contrary£»¡¡reason¡¡shows¡¡so¡¡pure¡¡a¡¡spontaneity¡¡in¡¡the¡¡case¡¡of¡¡what¡¡I
call¡¡ideas¡¡£§ideal¡¡conceptions£§¡¡that¡¡it¡¡thereby¡¡far¡¡transcends
everything¡¡that¡¡the¡¡sensibility¡¡can¡¡give¡¡it£»¡¡and¡¡exhibits¡¡its¡¡most
important¡¡function¡¡in¡¡distinguishing¡¡the¡¡world¡¡of¡¡sense¡¡from¡¡that¡¡of
understanding£»¡¡and¡¡thereby¡¡prescribing¡¡the¡¡limits¡¡of¡¡the¡¡understanding
itself¡£
¡¡¡¡For¡¡this¡¡reason¡¡a¡¡rational¡¡being¡¡must¡¡regard¡¡himself¡¡qua
intelligence¡¡£¨not¡¡from¡¡the¡¡side¡¡of¡¡his¡¡lower¡¡faculties£©¡¡as¡¡belonging
not¡¡to¡¡the¡¡world¡¡of¡¡sense£»¡¡but¡¡to¡¡that¡¡of¡¡understanding£»¡¡hence¡¡he
has¡¡two¡¡points¡¡of¡¡view¡¡from¡¡which¡¡he¡¡can¡¡regard¡¡himself£»¡¡and¡¡recognise
laws¡¡of¡¡the¡¡exercise¡¡of¡¡his¡¡faculties£»¡¡and¡¡consequently¡¡of¡¡all¡¡his
actions£º¡¡first£»¡¡so¡¡far¡¡as¡¡he¡¡belongs¡¡to¡¡the¡¡world¡¡of¡¡sense£»¡¡he¡¡finds
himself¡¡subject¡¡to¡¡laws¡¡of¡¡nature¡¡£¨heteronomy£©£»¡¡secondly£»¡¡as¡¡belonging
to¡¡the¡¡intelligible¡¡world£»¡¡under¡¡laws¡¡which¡¡being¡¡independent¡¡of
nature¡¡have¡¡their¡¡foundation¡¡not¡¡in¡¡experience¡¡but¡¡in¡¡reason¡¡alone¡£
¡¡¡¡As¡¡a¡¡rational¡¡being£»¡¡and¡¡consequently¡¡belonging¡¡to¡¡the
intelligible¡¡world£»¡¡man¡¡can¡¡never¡¡conceive¡¡the¡¡causality¡¡of¡¡his¡¡own
will¡¡otherwise¡¡than¡¡on¡¡condition¡¡of¡¡the¡¡idea¡¡of¡¡freedom£»¡¡for
independence¡¡of¡¡the¡¡determinate¡¡causes¡¡of¡¡the¡¡sensible¡¡world¡¡£¨an
independence¡¡which¡¡reason¡¡must¡¡always¡¡ascribe¡¡to¡¡itself£©¡¡is¡¡freedom¡£
Now¡¡the¡¡idea¡¡of¡¡freedom¡¡is¡¡inseparably¡¡connected¡¡with¡¡the¡¡conception
of¡¡autonomy£»¡¡and¡¡this¡¡again¡¡with¡¡the¡¡universal¡¡principle¡¡of¡¡morality
which¡¡is¡¡ideally¡¡the¡¡foundation¡¡of¡¡all¡¡actions¡¡of¡¡rational¡¡beings£»
just¡¡as¡¡the¡¡law¡¡of¡¡nature¡¡is¡¡of¡¡all¡¡phenomena¡£
¡¡¡¡Now¡¡the¡¡suspicion¡¡is¡¡removed¡¡which¡¡we¡¡raised¡¡above£»¡¡that¡¡there¡¡was¡¡a
latent¡¡circle¡¡involved¡¡in¡¡our¡¡reasoning¡¡from¡¡freedom¡¡to¡¡autonomy£»
and¡¡from¡¡this¡¡to¡¡the¡¡moral¡¡law£»¡¡viz¡££º¡¡that¡¡we¡¡laid¡¡down¡¡the¡¡idea¡¡of
freedom¡¡because¡¡of¡¡the¡¡moral¡¡law¡¡only¡¡that¡¡we¡¡might¡¡afterwards¡¡in¡¡turn
infer¡¡the¡¡latter¡¡from¡¡freedom£»¡¡and¡¡that¡¡consequently¡¡we¡¡could¡¡assign
no¡¡reason¡¡at¡¡all¡¡for¡¡this¡¡law£»¡¡but¡¡could¡¡only¡¡£§present£§¡¡it¡¡as¡¡a
petitio¡¡principii¡¡which¡¡well¡¡disposed¡¡minds¡¡would¡¡gladly¡¡concede¡¡to
us£»¡¡but¡¡which¡¡we¡¡could¡¡never¡¡put¡¡forward¡¡as¡¡a¡¡provable¡¡proposition¡£
For¡¡now¡¡we¡¡see¡¡that£»¡¡when¡¡we¡¡conceive¡¡ourselves¡¡as¡¡free£»¡¡we¡¡transfer
ourselves¡¡into¡¡the¡¡world¡¡of¡¡understanding¡¡as¡¡members¡¡of¡¡it¡¡and
recognise¡¡the¡¡autonomy¡¡of¡¡the¡¡will¡¡with¡¡its¡¡consequence£»¡¡morality£»
whereas£»¡¡if¡¡we¡¡conceive¡¡ourselves¡¡as¡¡under¡¡obligation£»¡¡we¡¡consider
ourselves¡¡as¡¡belonging¡¡to¡¡the¡¡world¡¡of¡¡sense¡¡and¡¡at¡¡the¡¡same¡¡time¡¡to
the¡¡world¡¡of¡¡understanding¡£
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡How¡¡is¡¡a¡¡Categorical¡¡Imperative¡¡Possible£¿
¡¡¡¡Every¡¡rational¡¡being¡¡reckons¡¡himself¡¡qua¡¡intelligence¡¡as¡¡belonging
to¡¡the¡¡world¡¡of¡¡understanding£»¡¡and¡¡it¡¡is¡¡simply¡¡as¡¡an¡¡efficient
cause¡¡belonging¡¡to¡¡that¡¡world¡¡that¡¡he¡¡calls¡¡his¡¡causality¡¡a¡¡will¡£¡¡On
the¡¡other¡¡side¡¡he¡¡is¡¡also¡¡conscious¡¡of¡¡himself¡¡as¡¡a¡¡part¡¡of¡¡the
world¡¡of¡¡sense¡¡in¡¡which¡¡his¡¡actions£»¡¡which¡¡are¡¡mere¡¡appearances
£§phenomena£§¡¡of¡¡that¡¡causality£»¡¡are¡¡displayed£»¡¡we¡¡cannot£»¡¡however£»
discern¡¡how¡¡they¡¡are¡¡possible¡¡from¡¡this¡¡causality¡¡which¡¡we¡¡do¡¡not
know£»¡¡but¡¡instead¡¡of¡¡that£»¡¡these¡¡actions¡¡as¡¡belonging¡¡to¡¡the
sensible¡¡world¡¡must¡¡be¡¡viewed¡¡as¡¡determined¡¡by¡¡other¡¡phenomena£»
namely£»¡¡desires¡¡and¡¡inclinations¡£¡¡If¡¡therefore¡¡I¡¡were¡¡only¡¡a¡¡member¡¡of
the¡¡world¡¡of¡¡understanding£»¡¡then¡¡all¡¡my¡¡actions¡¡would¡¡perfectly
conform¡¡to¡¡the¡¡principle¡¡of¡¡autonomy¡¡of¡¡the¡¡pure¡¡will£»¡¡if¡¡I¡¡were
only¡¡a¡¡part¡¡of¡¡the¡¡world¡¡of¡¡sense£»¡¡they¡¡would¡¡necessarily¡¡be¡¡assumed
to¡¡conform¡¡wholly¡¡to¡¡the¡¡natural¡¡law¡¡of¡¡desires¡¡and¡¡inclinations£»¡¡in
other¡¡words£»¡¡to¡¡the¡¡heteronomy¡¡of¡¡nature¡£¡¡£¨The¡¡former¡¡would¡¡rest¡¡on
morality¡¡as¡¡the¡¡supreme¡¡principle£»¡¡the¡¡latter¡¡on¡¡happiness¡££©¡¡Since£»
however£»¡¡the¡¡world¡¡of¡¡understanding¡¡contains¡¡the¡¡foundation¡¡of¡¡the
world¡¡of¡¡sense£»¡¡and¡¡consequently¡¡of¡¡its¡¡laws¡¡also£»¡¡and¡¡accordingly
gives¡¡the¡¡law¡¡to¡¡my¡¡will¡¡£¨which¡¡belongs¡¡wholly¡¡to¡¡the¡¡world¡¡of
understanding£©¡¡directly£»¡¡and¡¡must¡¡be¡¡conceived¡¡as¡¡doing¡¡so£»¡¡it¡¡follows
that£»¡¡although¡¡on¡¡the¡¡one¡¡side¡¡I¡¡must¡¡regard¡¡myself¡¡as¡¡a¡¡being
belonging¡¡to¡¡the¡¡world¡¡of¡¡sense£»¡¡yet¡¡on¡¡the¡¡other¡¡side¡¡I¡¡must
recognize¡¡myself¡¡as¡¡subject¡¡as¡¡an¡¡intelligence¡¡to¡¡the¡¡law¡¡of¡¡the¡¡world
of¡¡understanding£»¡¡i¡£e¡££»¡¡to¡¡reason£»¡¡which¡¡contains¡¡this¡¡law¡¡in¡¡the¡¡idea
of¡¡freedom£»¡¡and¡¡therefore¡¡as¡¡subject¡¡to¡¡the¡¡autonomy¡¡of¡¡the¡¡will£º
consequently¡¡I¡¡must¡¡regard¡¡the¡¡laws¡¡of¡¡the¡¡world¡¡of¡¡understanding¡¡as
imperatives¡¡for¡¡me¡¡and¡¡the¡¡actions¡¡which¡¡conform¡¡to¡¡them¡¡as¡¡duties¡£
¡¡¡¡And¡¡thus¡¡what¡¡makes¡¡categorical¡¡imperatives¡¡possible¡¡is¡¡this£»¡¡that
the¡¡idea¡¡of¡¡freedom¡¡makes¡¡me¡¡a¡¡member¡¡of¡¡an¡¡intelligible¡¡world£»¡¡in
consequence¡¡of¡¡which£»¡¡if¡¡I¡¡were¡¡nothing¡¡else£»¡¡all¡¡my¡¡actions¡¡would
always¡¡conform¡¡to¡¡the¡¡autonomy¡¡of¡¡the¡¡will£»¡¡but¡¡as¡¡I¡¡at¡¡the¡¡same
time¡¡intuite¡¡myself¡¡as¡¡a¡¡member¡¡of¡¡the¡¡world¡¡of¡¡sense£»¡¡they¡¡ought¡¡so
to¡¡conform£»¡¡and¡¡this¡¡categorical¡¡¡¨ought¡¨¡¡implies¡¡a¡¡synthetic¡¡a
priori¡¡proposition£»¡¡inasmuch¡¡as¡¡besides¡¡my¡¡will¡¡as¡¡affected¡¡by
sensible¡¡desires¡¡there¡¡is¡¡added¡¡further¡¡the¡¡idea¡¡of¡¡the¡¡same¡¡will
but¡¡as¡¡belonging¡¡to¡¡the¡¡world¡¡of¡¡the¡¡understanding£»¡¡pure¡¡and¡¡practical
of¡¡itself£»¡¡which¡¡contains¡¡the¡¡supreme¡¡condition¡¡according¡¡to¡¡reason¡¡of
the¡¡former¡¡will£»¡¡precisely¡¡as¡¡to¡¡the¡¡intuitions¡¡of¡¡sense¡¡there¡¡are
added¡¡concepts¡¡of¡¡the¡¡understanding¡¡which¡¡of¡¡themselves¡¡signify
nothing¡¡but¡¡regular¡¡form¡¡in¡¡general¡¡and¡¡in¡¡this¡¡way¡¡synthetic¡¡a¡¡priori
propositions¡¡become¡¡possible£»¡¡on¡¡which¡¡all¡¡knowledge¡¡of¡¡physical
nature¡¡rests¡£
¡¡¡¡The¡¡practical¡¡use¡¡of¡¡common¡¡human¡¡reason¡¡confirms¡¡this¡¡reasoning¡£
There¡¡is¡¡no¡¡one£»¡¡not¡¡even¡¡the¡¡most¡¡consummate¡¡villain£»¡¡provided¡¡only
that¡¡be¡¡is¡¡otherwise¡¡accustomed¡¡to¡¡the¡¡use¡¡of¡¡reason£»¡¡who£»¡¡when¡¡we¡¡set
before¡¡him¡¡examples¡¡of¡¡honesty¡¡of¡¡purpose£»¡¡of¡¡steadfastness¡¡in
following¡¡good¡¡maxims£»¡¡of¡¡sympathy¡¡and¡¡general¡¡benevolence¡¡£¨even
combined¡¡with¡¡great¡¡sacrifices¡¡of¡¡advantages¡¡and¡¡comfort£©£»¡¡does¡¡not
wish¡¡that¡¡he¡¡might¡¡also¡¡possess¡¡these¡¡qualities¡£¡¡Only¡¡on¡¡account¡¡of
his¡¡inclinations¡¡and¡¡impulses¡¡he¡¡cannot¡¡attain¡¡this¡¡in¡¡himself£»¡¡but¡¡at
the¡¡same¡¡time¡¡he¡¡wishes¡¡to¡¡be¡¡free¡¡from¡¡such¡¡inclinations¡¡which¡¡are
burdensome¡¡to¡¡himself¡£¡¡He¡¡proves¡¡by¡¡this¡¡that¡¡he¡¡transfers¡¡himself
in¡¡thought¡¡with¡¡a¡¡will¡¡free¡¡from¡¡the¡¡impulses¡¡of¡¡the¡¡sensibility
into¡¡an¡¡order¡¡of¡¡things¡¡wholly¡¡different¡¡from¡¡that¡¡of¡¡his¡¡desires¡¡in
the¡¡field¡¡of¡¡the¡¡sensibility£»¡¡since¡¡he¡¡cannot¡¡expect¡¡to¡¡obtain¡¡by¡¡that
wish¡¡any¡¡gratification¡¡of¡¡his¡¡desires£»¡¡nor¡¡any¡¡position¡¡which¡¡would
satisfy¡¡any¡¡of¡¡his¡¡actual¡¡or¡¡supposable¡¡inclinations¡¡£¨for¡¡this¡¡would
destroy¡¡the¡¡pre¡eminence¡¡of¡¡the¡¡very¡¡idea¡¡which¡¡wrests¡¡that¡¡wish
from¡¡him£©£º¡¡he¡¡can¡¡only¡¡expect¡¡a¡¡greater¡¡intrinsic¡¡worth¡¡of¡¡his¡¡own
person¡£¡¡This¡¡better¡¡person£»¡¡however£»¡¡he¡¡imagines¡¡himself¡¡to¡¡be¡¡when¡¡be
transfers¡¡himself¡¡to¡¡the¡¡point¡¡of¡¡view¡¡of¡¡a¡¡member¡¡of¡¡the¡¡world¡¡of¡¡the
understanding£»¡¡to¡¡which¡¡he¡¡is¡¡involuntarily¡¡forced¡¡by¡¡the¡¡idea¡¡of
freedom£»¡¡i¡£e¡££»¡¡of¡¡independence¡¡on¡¡determining¡¡causes¡¡of¡¡the¡¡world¡¡of
sense£»¡¡and¡¡from¡¡this¡¡point¡¡of¡¡view¡¡he¡¡is¡¡conscious¡¡of¡¡a¡¡good¡¡will£»
which¡¡by¡¡his¡¡own¡¡confession¡¡constitutes¡¡the¡¡law¡¡for¡¡the¡¡bad¡¡will
that¡¡he¡¡possesses¡¡as¡¡a¡¡member¡¡of¡¡the¡¡world¡¡of¡¡sense¡¡¡a¡¡law¡¡whose
authority¡¡he¡¡recognizes¡¡while¡¡transgressing¡¡it¡£¡¡What¡¡he¡¡morally
¡¨ought¡¨¡¡is¡¡then¡¡what¡¡he¡¡necessarily¡¡¡¨would£»¡¨¡¡as¡¡a¡¡member¡¡of¡¡the
world¡¡of¡¡the¡¡understanding£»¡¡and¡¡is¡¡conceived¡¡by¡¡him¡¡as¡¡an¡¡¡¨ought¡¨¡¡only
inasmuch¡¡as¡¡he¡¡likewise¡¡considers¡¡himself¡¡as¡¡a¡¡member¡¡of¡¡the¡¡world
of¡¡sense¡£
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡Of¡¡the¡¡Extreme¡¡Limits¡¡of¡¡all¡¡Practical¡¡Philosophy¡£
¡¡¡¡All¡¡men¡¡attribute¡¡to¡¡themselves¡¡freedom¡¡of¡¡will¡£¡¡Hence¡¡come¡¡all
judgements¡¡upon¡¡actions¡¡as¡¡being¡¡such¡¡as¡¡ought¡¡to¡¡have¡¡been¡¡done£»
although¡¡they¡¡have¡¡not¡¡been¡¡done¡£¡¡However£»¡¡this¡¡freedom¡¡is¡¡not¡¡a
conception¡¡of¡¡experience£»¡¡n